Comparison of an ELISA and a HPLC for Determination of Ciprofloxacin Residues in Pork

ZH Yuan,JH Duan,SX Fan,K Kong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540100120075853
IF: 3.268
2001-01-01
Food and Agricultural Immunology
Abstract:To determine ciprofloxacin (CPFX) residues in pork, an ELISA and a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure were developed and compared on sensitivity, precision and accuracy. For ELISA, CPFX was converted by an active ester method into CFPX-human serum albumin (CPFX-HSA) and CFPX-bovine serum albumin (CPFX-BSA), and the latter allowed the production of CPFX-specific rabbit antisera for the development of an indirect competitive ELISA procedure. For HPLC, an ODS reverse phase column was used with ultraviolet detection, and triethylamine and acetonitrile (87:13) were employed as mobile phase. The limits of detection (LODs) were 0.32 ng ml -1 for ELISA and 10 ng ml -1 for HPLC. The linear detection ranges were 0.32-5000 ng ml -1 for ELISA and 10-5120 ng ml -1 for HPLC. The coefficients of variation were 4.51-11.50% for ELISA and 0.70-9.10% for HPLC over the range of CPFX concentrations of each method. The mean recovery of HPLC (80.58%) was higher than that of ELISA (66.18%). The results suggested that the ELISA, with its high detection throughput and excellent sensitivity and specificity, could be used as a screening method for CPFX residues in pork. The HPLC, for its great precision and accuracy, was an effective confirmatory method for CPFX residues in pork.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?