Abstract:This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation.Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical‐chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified as excluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat non‐specific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization.Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α‐helices and strands of β‐sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen‐bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of "frustration" is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved.Putting the "bottom line" at the top: it is likely that hydrogen‐bond satisfaction represents a largely under‐appreciated parameter in protein folding models.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Are proteins made from a limited parts list?

Theoretical Perspectives on Protein Folding

Protein Folding: From Classical Issues to a New Perspective

Solving the protein folding problem...

Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving

The Folding Transition State of Protein L is Extensive with Nonnative Interactions (and Not Small and Polarized)

Protein Folding: An Introduction

Is Protein Folding a Thermodynamically Unfavorable, Active, Energy-Dependent Process?

Simple Models of the Protein Folding Problem

Introduction to protein folding for physicists

Are Protein Folds Atypical?

Protein Folding: A Perspective From Statistical Physics

Protein Folding from the Perspective of Chaperone Action

Protein folding and misfolding

Exploring the mechanisms of protein folding

Introduction to Protein Folding

The Last Secret of Protein Folding: The Real Relationship Between Long-Range Interactions and Local Structures

Thermodynamic control and dynamical regimes in protein folding

Protein folding in the modern era: a pedestrian's guide

Frustration, function and folding

Studies of Protein Folding Pathways