The Diffusion of 'green' Technology:Comparison of Three Electronics Industrial Clusters in China

史进,童昕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.09.021

2010-01-01

Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment

Abstract:Increasing attentions have been paid to the impacts of the global environmental governance on the path of technological change in the developing countries for a sustainable future at the global scale.However,while various regulation approaches targeting global supply chains adopted in the developed countries,seldom have empirical researches been done in the developing world.This piece of work focuses on the diffusion of lead-free soldering technology within electronics manufacturers in three electronics industrial clusters in China in response to the recent EU directives on electronics products,to demonstrate the trans-boundary effects of the environmental regulations in the developed world on the technological dynamics in the developing country.Firm-level investigations were conducted in three electronics industrial clusters in China,namely Beijing,Shanghai-Suzhou and Shenzhen-Dongguan in 2006 and 2007 after a series of pilot fieldwork in those regions.We find that the EU directives played a critical role in promoting the diffusion of lead-free soldering technology within electronics producers while significant differences existed in the adoption behavior among the producers in the three regions.A logistic regression model was formulated to develop a deeper understanding of the factors underpinning firms' decision to adopt the lead-free technology.The results show that 'target market' and 'geographical cluster' emerge from the analysis as significant factors while 'investment origin',though significant,fails to comply with the hypothesis.Moreover,the position in the production chain and the overall environmental management capability of the firm are further features that emerge as significant factors of firm's adoption decision.However,the innovation capacity at firm level didn't contribute significantly to firm's adoption,which shows the limits of unilateral pressure of global environmental governance.