Construction of the Hearing System in Forensic Psychiatry Appraisal

ZHANG Yan,LI Dong,GE Lu-zou,ZHANG Ji,CHANG Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2012.02.004

2012-01-01

Abstract:Compared to other types of appraisal,forensic psychiatry appraisal is fairly special and full of controversy.The appraisal results determine the party's responsibility,the competency to stand trial,the witness's testified ability,the victim's sexual self-defense ability,the offender's competency to serve a sentence and so on.They directly relate to the vital interests of the parties and have great influence to a case.But its academic characters that lack experimental data to support its conclusion and its appraisal methods that rely on documentary evidence make it easy for the parties to suspect and dispute about the conclusion.To solve the problem,this article suggests that the hearing system which is characterized by its openness and parties' involvement should be introduced.Before appraisal conclusions are made,the relevant parties should have the opportunities to provide,cross examine,explain and argue about the evidence.They also bear the burden of persuading the other party.By participating in and supervising the appraisal process,they are more likely to eliminate confusion and controversy,and understand the conclusion.