Value of 64-Row Helical CT in Detection and Staging of Metastatic Lymphadenopathy of Gastric Cancer

WU Bing,LU Tao,CHEN Xinzu,SUN Jiayu,LI Zhenlin,HUANG Zixing,YANG Zhigang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9324.2008.08.017
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of 64 row helical CT to detect metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer.Materials and Methods From June 2006 to January 2007,56 consecutive patients diagnosed as gastric cancer were examined with a 64 row helical CT scanner before surgery at West China Hospital.Two radiologists independently evaluated the N staging on the CT images.Perigastric and extragastric lymph nodes were considered to be involved when the short axial diameter was ≥5 mm.The UICC and GRGCS classification were independently applied.Differences in staging accuracy for N staging were assessed using the McNemar test.P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistical significantion.Results Surgical pathology resultes showed 256 lymph nodes larger than 5 mm on short axial diameter,and 210(210/256) lymph nodes confirmed metastasis.MDCT imaging showed 240(94%) of 256 lymph nodes larger than 5 mm and 200(95%) of 210 metastasis lymph nodes were detected.The accuracy and detection rate of CT were higher in perigastric or paravessel groups.The overall accuracy for N staging of lymph nodes involvement was 80% for GRGCS and 77% for UICC classification.Overstaging of the N stage occurred in 8(14%) of 56 cases with GRGCS and 5(9%) of 56 cases with UICC classification,whereas understaging in 3(6%) of 56 cases with GRGCS and 8(14%) of 56 cases with UICC classification.The difference in staging between GRGCS and UICC was not statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion 64-row helical CT is effective for detection of metastatic lymphadenopathy and provides no different results between GRGCS and UICC staging.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?