Abstract:National science is being transformed under the influence of global processes, which are mainly, although not entirely, dictated by the dominance of neoliberal ideas in a wide range of developed and developing countries. The term neoliberalism, (or neo-liberalism), which was coined in the 20th century, offers recommendations that include a set of political, economic, and ideological actions. The article examines the impact of the neoliberal turn in science on the process of interaction between science and society. It is substantiated that this affects the development of vector models for the spread of scientific neoliberal ideology. Academia is a research field that deals with a wide range of issues from actual dissemination of scientific research to the models of involving new constituencies, in which non-professionals are encouraged to participate in research via scientific discussions and polls. Academia is a global and debatable topic to be discussed. It should be noted that scientific communications as a process of promoting scientific knowledge outside the scientific communities have not been thoroughly studied by domestic researchers yet. In the international scientific community and the Russian scientific field, until recently, the understanding of the tasks of scientific communication varied greatly. However, the development of scientific communities is widespread in different countries and reveals the impacts of neoliberalism research on this process. The neoliberal initiative encourages the creation of conditions in which, firstly, citizens take an active part in solving scientific issues. And secondly, the prestige of the pursuit of pure science does not deter researchers from promoting commercialization and the free development of their scientific activity. The peculiarities of interaction between science and society are regarded from the point of view of the Italian sociologist Massimiano Bucchi. Distinguished in academic discourse for his classification of relationships among science, technology, and society, M. Bucchi specifies three patterns for such relationships: deficit, dialogue, and completion.

Communication of Science Shop Mediation: A Kaleidoscope of University-Society Relations

Science shops: A kaleidoscope of science-society collaborations in Europe

Amsterdam Science Shop and Its Influence on University Research: the Effects of Ten Year of Dealing with Non-Academic Questions

Sociological and Communication-Theoretical Perspectives on the Commercialization of the Sciences

Science Shops in Europe: the Public As Stakeholder

The Communication Turn in Philosophy of Science

The Sciences Are Discursive Constructs: the Communication Perspective As an Empirical Philosophy of Science

Science Communication a New Frontier of Researcher's Job

Learning to Generate Dialogue: Theory, Practice, and Evaluation

The complex dynamics of scientific communication

Science stories as culture: experience, identity, narrative and emotion in public communication of science

The Communication of Meaning and Information , and the Structuration of Expectations as Discursive Knowledge Introduction

Evaluation of Research and Evolution of Science Indicators

It is essential to connect: Evaluating a Science Communication Boot Camp

Scientific Communication and Codification

German Communication Studies facing the challenge of digital media change: debates and controversies in the scientific community since the 1990s

Making science communication inclusive: an exploratory study of choices, challenges and change mechanisms in the United States from an emerging movement

Scientific Communication and Cognitive Codification: Social Systems Theory and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge

Public Participation and Scientific Citizenship in the Science Museum in London: Visitors’ Perceptions of the Museum as a Broker

Science Shops as key intermediary structures to respond to the current health research agenda bias: Evidence from the InSPIRES project

The Impact of Neoliberalism on Models of Science Communication