The role of the right atrial appendage and right atrium in post-radiofrequency ablation recurrence in different types of atrial fibrillation
T Pan,X Tian,Y Liu,H-Q Yang,G-J Ma,X-N Han,C-Y Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.017
2024-07-30
Abstract:Aim: To quantitatively evaluate the relationship between the anatomical parameters of the right atrium and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after radiofrequency ablation, considering different types of AF, utilizing 256-slice spiral computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods: A total of 297 patients with AF who underwent initial radiofrequency ablation were enrolled, divided into the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PaAF) group (n=230) and the persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) group (n=67). Subsequently, patients in each group were further stratified into recurrent and non-recurrent subgroups. In addition, 100 healthy outpatients were selected as the normal group. All patients underwent preoperative cardiac CT (CCT) examination. The volumes of the right atrium (RA), right atrial appendage (RAA), and left atrial (LA), RAA height, the length, short diameter, perimeter, and area of the RAA base, anteroposterior diameter of the RA, tricuspid annulus diameter, crista terminalis, and inferior vena cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) on CCT images were measured. Results: In both the PaAF group and the PeAF group, except for the crista terminalis thickness, the other measured parameters were greater than those in the normal group, and recurrent patients exhibited larger RAA base, crista terminalis and LA volume. Recurrent patients with PeAF presented larger RAVI, while recurrent patients with PaAF did not. The short diameter of the RAA base was an independent predictor of recurrence in patients with PaAF (p=0.001), while the height of the RAA, thickness of the crista terminalis, and hypertension were independent predictors of recurrence in PeAF (p<0.05). The ROC curve was used to analysis the predictive model in PaAF and PeAF group, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 0.604 and 0.864 in PaAF group, respectively (AUC = 0.840, P=0.001), in PeAF group, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 0.967 and 0.892, respectively (AUC = 0.959, P=0.001). The short diameter of RAA base > 22.15 mm had the highest predictive value for recurrence in PaAF patients, with a sensitivity of 0.887, and a specificity of 0.520 (AUC: 0.743, p=0.001). The RAA height > 28.95 mm has the highest predictive value for recurrence in PeAF, with a sensitivity of 0.633, and a specificity of 0.865 (AUC: 0.816, p=0.001). Conclusion: Recurrent patients both in the PaAF and PeAF groups demonstrated larger RAA base and RA structural parameters. Compared to patients with PaAF, recurrent patients with PeAF presented larger RA volume.