Quality Differences of Master Theses among Different Engineering Disciplines ——Based on Data from National Sampling on Master Theses, 2014
Yao GAO,Hongjie CHEN,Wenqing SHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-1663.2017.02.006
2017-01-01
Abstract:Based on the outcomes of a sampling on 5,415 engineering master theses nationwide 2014, the author has carried out a quantitative study on the quality of the theses divided into different disciplines. The results show that the overall qualified rate of all the engineering theses sampled is 99.02 percent, 0.78 percentage point higher than that of all the master theses sampled the same year in China, and that the overall mean score of the theses from the first-class disciplines under engineering category is 82.50 points, 1.48 points higher than that of all the theses sampled the same year in China. The score of engineering theses being broken down in items is ranked, from high to low, in the sequence of topic selection, general description, research ability, mastery of basic knowledge, standardability and innovation in paper writing and the paper value. In different first-class disciplines, the score of the theses, disclosed by the secondary indicator dimensions, shows differences. The identified disciplines quality differences under the engineering category of this study may provide a reference for degree-granting institutions, disciplines institutions and supervisors to carry out diagnostic assessments, quality improvement programs and early warning and monitoring jobs.