Risk factors and treatment outcomes in patients with superior mesenteric venous thrombosis: a single-center retrospective report
崔进,王冕,姚陈,王深明,宁俊杰,胡作军,秦原森,王劲松,王斯文,李梓伦,常光其,石毅
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101411-20210505-00041
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the most appropriate strategies for the diagnosis and the treatment of superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (SMVT).Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 128 patients with SMVT admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2003 to December 2017. Among all the cases, there were 88 males and 40 females, with a age of (41.78±14.22) years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment method: surgery group ( n=46) and conservative treatment group ( n=82). The clinical characteristics, symptoms and signs, hospitalization and follow-up of cases in both two groups were statistically analyzed and compared to summarize the clinical outcome and prognosis of SMVT. Results:Of all the 128 SMVT patients, 98 cases presented acute onset (time period <14 days) and among them, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients received surgery or conservative treatment (39/46 vs. 59/82, χ2=1.734, P=0.100). There were 125 symptomatic patients (97.65%). The incidence rate of nausea (54.35% vs. 29.27%, χ2=7.845, P=0.005), vomiting (52.17% vs. 28.05%, χ2=7.381, P=0.007), abdominal distension (54.35% vs. 32.93%, χ2=5.606, P=0.018), cessation of defecation (39.13% vs. 17.07%, χ2=7.647, P=0.006), rebound-tenderness (78.26% vs. 35.37%, χ2=21.690, P<0.001), abdominal muscle tension (67.39% vs. 21.95%, χ2=25.750, P<0.001), shifting dullness (32.61% vs. 9.76%, χ2=10.440, P=0.001), shortness of breath (13.04% vs. 2.44%, P=0.017), increased heart rate (45.65% vs. 12.20%, χ2=17.970, P<0.001), and decreased blood pressure (18.70% vs. 1.22%, P=0.036) were significantly higher in the surgery group than in the conservative treatment group. In addition, the proportion of patients with positive diagnostic peritoneocentesis in the surgery group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (15 vs. 0, P<0.05). A total of 118 patients underwent anticoagulant therapy including all cases in the surgery group while 43 patients went through thrombolytic treatment. No death occurred during hospitalization. Operations performed on all the cases in the surgery group were successful and emergency operations accounted for 91.30%(42/46), mainly including exploratory laparotomy and removal of necrotic intestinal section. The main postoperative complications were abdominal infection (3/46, 6.52%) and incision site infection (3/46, 6.52%). Follow-up visits were performed on 72 patients, with a follow-up period of (83.26±27.91) months. During follow-up, there were 10 cases of intestinal obstruction, 5 of intestinal ischemia, 4 of hemorrhage of digestive tract and 6 of short-bowel syndrome. Five non-SMVT-related deaths occurred, all of which were patients treated conservatively. Conclusion:If clinical signs and symptoms of highly-suspected intestinal necrosis present, or if non-coagulable fluid is withdrawn by exploratory laparotomy, prompt surgery to remove necrotic intestinal section or to rescue ischemic intestine should be performed. Early anticoagulant therapy is essential to alleviate SMVT symptoms and improve prognosis.