Decent Work and Workplace Deviance Among Chinese Physicians: A Relative Deprivation Perspective
Yafan Fan,Tongbo Deng,Min Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S405463
IF: 3.974
2023-04-25
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Yafan Fan, 1, &ast Tongbo Deng, 1, &ast Min Li 2 1 School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Yafan Fan, School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 13469968950, Email Purpose: Managing workplace deviance has long been a hot topic in the organizational research. However, the mechanisms through which decent work affects workplace deviance have yet to be fully understood. Drawing upon relative deprivation theory, this study examines the relationship between decent work and workplace deviance by focusing on the mediating role of relative deprivation and the moderating role of career calling. Methods: Two waves of data from 307 doctors and 61 supervisors of public hospitals in central China were examined using a the moderated mediation model. Results: Decent work is negatively associated with workplace deviance via the mediation of relative deprivation, and the negative relationship between decent work and relative deprivation is negatively moderated by career calling. The mediating role of relative deprivation is moderated by career calling, and the indirect effect is stronger when career calling is high than when it is low. Conclusion: By focusing on the mediating role of relative deprivation and the moderating role of career calling, this study contributes to the literature by addressing the previously unexamined relationship between decent work and workplace deviance. Moreover, this study responds to calls for research on decent work from the perspective of relative deprivation. Keywords: decent work, workplace deviance, relative deprivation, career calling, physicians The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a heavy toll on health workers—who, like all other workers, deserve the right to decent work—and exposed the systemic lack of safeguards for their health, safety and well-being. 1 The International Labor Organization (ILO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) jointly urge better safety protection for health workers 1 and call for taking the necessary steps to address inequities and inequalities within the health workforce, including decent, safe working conditions and adequate pay. 2 Health workers are exposed to undignified working conditions for long periods of time, and deviant behaviors will occur when they cannot tolerate the current workload and work safety threats, 3,4 which directly affects their workplace performance. 3 The construct of decent work was first proposed by the ILO. 5 Later, scholars' studies on decent work were extended from the macro to the micro level. Duffy et al 6 proposed the psychology of working theory (PWT), which took decent work as the core variable and connected it with contextual resources, psychological resources and well-being. Although the decent work framework under PWT has been extensively studied, its research mainly adopts a Western cultural perspective, 6 and relatively little research conducted in other cultural contexts such as the Eastern cultural context, especially that in China. 7,8 It is therefore important to explore the relevance and applicability of the decent work framework in the Eastern cultural context to better understand its potential effects on workplace behavior. 7,9 With the in-depth study of decent work, scholars shifted their exploration of decent work from vocational psychology to organizational behavior (OB) and human resource management (HRM). 10 Accordingly, recent studies have primarily examined the positive effects of decent work, such as its impact on physical health, 11 innovative behavior, 12 proactive behavior, 13 employee performance, 7 and affective commitment. 9 However, there has been limited attention given to the potential negative consequences of decent work, such as burnout 14,15 and work fatigue. 11,16 Therefore, it is crucial to examine the negative aspects of decent work to gain a more comprehensive understanding of its impact on employees in various work settings. 17 Burnout and work fatigue represent the loss of a healthy working state, while workplace deviance is a violation that further harms the organization 3 rather than an internal mental friction. Currently, there is a lack of literature examining the poten -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary