Abstract:Earlier studies have shown that retinohypothalamic projections terminate extensively within the hypothalamus of the rat. Recently, we identified a light retinal projection to the supraoptic nucleus as well as a larger, well-focused projection resulting in a peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. In this study, we employed a double labeling method with cholera toxin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (CT-HRP) and pseudorabies virus, a transsynaptic neural tracer, to evaluate retinorecipient neurons in both the supraoptic nucleus and peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. In addition, we looked for evidence that cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field project into the supraoptic nucleus. Three strains of pseudorabies virus were compared. A direct retinosupraoptic nucleus circuit was confirmed with all three strains. Retinorecipient neurons in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field were also confirmed. However, there was a strain-based difference in the identification of these neurons. The wild-type Becker strain labeled cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field in a manner paralleling the early, intermediate and late stages of infection of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This parallel time course suggests that retinal ganglion cells terminate directly on cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. Conversely, the Bartha and PRV-91 strains showed appreciable labeling of peri-supraoptic neurons only at long survival times. This longer time course suggests that these mutant strains label neurons in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field indirectly, after passing through additional neurons. In addition, experiments with monocular injection of CT-HRP and posterior pituitary injection of pseudorabies virus showed retrogradely labeled second-order cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus amidst the CT-HRP labeled terminal field of the retinohypothalamic tract. These results demonstrate a direct projection from the retina to the supraoptic nucleus and provide evidence for an indirect circuit from the retina to the supraoptic nucleus via neurons located in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. The strain-based differences imply that those retinal ganglion cells that project to the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field differ from those that project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus. In addition, these results suggest a neuroanatomic basis for photic effects on physiological mechanisms that are not mediated by the circadian timing system. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Direct and Indirect Retinohypothalamic Projections to the Supraoptic Nucleus in the Female Albino Rat