Abstract:Phase estimation, due to Kitaev [arXiv'95], is one of the most fundamental subroutines in quantum computing. In the basic scenario, one is given black-box access to a unitary $U$, and an eigenstate $\lvert \psi \rangle$ of $U$ with unknown eigenvalue $e^{i\theta}$, and the task is to estimate the eigenphase $\theta$ within $\pm\delta$, with high probability. The cost of an algorithm for us will be the number of applications of $U$ and $U^{-1}$. We tightly characterize the cost of several variants of phase estimation where we are no longer given an arbitrary eigenstate, but are required to estimate the maximum eigenphase of $U$, aided by advice in the form of states (or a unitary preparing those states) which are promised to have at least a certain overlap $\gamma$ with the top eigenspace. We give algorithms and matching lower bounds (up to logarithmic factors) for all ranges of parameters. We show that a small number of copies of the advice state (or of an advice-preparing unitary) are not significantly better than having no advice at all. We also show that having lots of advice (applications of the advice-preparing unitary) does not significantly reduce cost, and neither does knowledge of the eigenbasis of $U$. As an immediate consequence we obtain a lower bound on the complexity of the Unitary recurrence time problem, matching an upper bound of She and Yuen~[ITCS'23] and resolving one of their open questions. Lastly, we show that a phase-estimation algorithm with precision $\delta$ and error probability $\epsilon$ has cost $\Omega\left(\frac{1}{\delta}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$, matching an easy upper bound. This contrasts with some other scenarios in quantum computing (e.g., search) where error-reduction costs only a factor $O(\sqrt{\log(1/\epsilon)})$. Our lower bound technique uses a variant of the polynomial method with trigonometric polynomials.

Optimal Quantum Circuits For General Phase Estimation

Optimal phase estimation in quantum networks

Optimum phase estimation with two control qubits

Optimal Low-Depth Quantum Signal-Processing Phase Estimation

Optimal Coherent Quantum Phase Estimation via Tapering

Heisenberg-limited Bayesian phase estimation with low-depth digital quantum circuits

On low-depth algorithms for quantum phase estimation

Enhancing the precision of a phase measurement through phase-sensitive non-Gaussianity

Agnostic Phase Estimation

Tight Bounds for Quantum Phase Estimation and Related Problems

Time-adaptive phase estimation

Optimal compilation of parametrised quantum circuits

Optimal qubit circuits for quantum-enhanced telescopes

Reductive Quantum Phase Estimation

Multiple Phase Estimation in Quantum Cloning Machines

A Note on Quantum Phase Estimation

Prefect Protection of Quantum-Enhanced Metrology from Dephasing Noise

Optimal Quantum Phase Estimation in an Atomic Gyroscope

Quantum Phase Processing and its Applications in Estimating Phase and Entropies

Even shorter quantum circuit for phase estimation on early fault-tolerant quantum computers with applications to ground-state energy estimation

Generalized phase estimation in noisy quantum gates