Carcinoma of the Collecting Ducts of Bellini:a Clinicopathological Study

肖立,陆孝禹,朱雄增
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7399.2008.02.016
2008-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To study the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of renal carcinoma of the collecting ducts of Bellini (CCDB). Methods 2 cases of CCDB were observed clinically and morphologically, detected by immunohistochemical staining of CK7, CK19, CK20, 34βE12, vimentin, CD10, P504S, E-cadherin, and compared to 9 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) with type 2 and Fuhrman grading Ⅲ, 6 cases of urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the renal pelvis with high grade and broad parenchymal invasion. CCDB accounted for 0.66% of total renal carcinomas in the same period, usually presented haematuria, 1 of the 2 cases died of lung metastases 3 month later after operation. Tumors were located in the medullary zone, consisted of tubular structure with sarcomatoid differentiation, infiltrated renal parenchyma diffusely with desmoplastic stroma and neutrophilia, and displayed epithelial dysplasia in collecting ducts nearby. Immunohistochemially, CK19, vimentin were positive (2/2), CK7 and 34βE12 positive (1/2),CK20, CD10, P504S, E-cadherin were negative. Whereas epithelial dysplasia was not seen in PRCC and UC. PRCC expressed vimentin(8/9), CD10 (7/9), P504S(7/9), CK7(3/9), CK19(1/9), but 34βE12, E-cadherin and CK20 were negative. UC expressed CK7, CK19, 34βE12(6/6),E-cadherin(5/6) and CK20(4/6),but CD10 and P504S were negative. Conclusions CCDB is a rare and high grade renal cell carcinoma with morphological and immunohistochemical varieties. The grey-white appearance with medullary location, epithelial dysplasia in collecting ducts, and no urothelial dysplasia and UC in-situ are the major criteria for differential diagnosis from PRCC and UC. Immunohistochemical staining of CD10, CK19, 34βE12, P504S, and E-cadherin is helpful in the differential diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?