Abstract:According to new economic geography,this paper analyzes the changes of centripetal and centrifugal forces from the view of influencing factors using static and dynamic methods.The resultant force of centripetal and centrifugal forces in different regions is different,the driving force of industrial transfer comes from comparative advantage of the resultant force.TFP(total factor productivity) is the substitution variables of the resultant force.Technology,institutional,specialized mode and innovation factors are influencing factors of TFP,the flow rate of the influencing factors is faster than the labor mobility.The ratio of capital to labor is relatively stable,the speed of labor mobility restricts the productivity of the production portfolio,the adjustment speed of the production factor productivity lags behind TFP adjustment speed.Therefore,we draw an important conclusion: The decision basis for spatial location selection is based on TFP changes rather than changes of resource allocation efficiency. On the statistics data of China's manufacturing enterprises in 2001～2009,we use a semi-parametric estimation method to measure TFP.Through a deeply TFP comparative analysis between textile industries and other industries in China's eastern,central and western regions,we find that the intrinsic motivation of China's textile industry from the east to the Midwest has been appeared in 2001 and strengthened year by year from 2001 to 2007.In fact,contrary to the direction of the intrinsic dynamic action,in 2001～2007 textile industries transfer is from the Midwest to the east,spatial allocation efficiency of production factors is rising.In 2007～2009 textile industries transfer is from the east to the Midwest,spatial allocation efficiency of production factors shows a downward trend from 2007 to 2009.Further studies show that: China's textile industry transfer of the inverse driving force in 2001～2007,lose the opportunity to obtain higher spatial allocation efficiency,there is a decision loss.In 2007～2009,spatial allocation efficiency of production factors is decline mainly because 2001～2007 textile industry inverse transfer is the incremental transfer rather than stock transfer.The incremental transfer increases the investment scale of entire textile industry,relative surplus of the investment scale in 2007～2009 is the main reason for decline of spatial resources allocation efficiency. Our results show that industrial transfer is not a simple device migration,but transfer of the ability and opportunity.Because the market price changes lag behind TFP changes,market price mechanism can not immediately react to this information when the intrinsic motivation of industrial transfer appeared.In addition,the enterprise exists multiple enterprise heterogeneity in the level of management,risk preferences,information processing ability,a large number of micro decision-making enterprises rely solely on market information to capture the opportunity of industry transfer with a lag.Enterprise multi-heterogeneity is the main reason for independent decision-making companies without the same decision-making on driving force.Since the industry transfer information of market mechanisms capturing is sub-optimal information,there is a decision loss relying solely on market mechanisms.If the government can not develop an effective industry transfer policy to make up for market information failures,would not eliminate the loss of opportunities for decision-making of spatial resources allocation efficiency in the industrial transfer.Therefore,some effective external policies are still needed to quicken the mass transferring process by developing appropriate policies to reduce the opportunities loss for decision-making of the spatial resources allocation efficiency and focusing on the coordinated development of human capital,physical capital,technology and financial markets.

Propelling Effects of Industrial Upgrading of Eastern Areas on Development of Central and Western Areas

Infrastructure,Industrial Agglomeration and Regional Coordination

Interregional Economic Linkage and Regional Development Driving Forces Based on an Interregional Input-Output Analysis of China

Housing Price' Regional Differences,Labor Mobility and Industrial Upgrading

Urbanization in less-developed areas boosted by industry transfer:taking Shanggao of Jiangxi Province for example

Interregional Industrial Transfer and Stability of Industrial Agglomeration

Industrial Upgrading and Land Use in Yangtze River Delta Area

Transfer of International Manufacture Capital: Reasons, Technology Learning, and Policy - The Empirical Analysis of Industrial Division in Development Zone of Jiangsu Province

Firms’ Spanning-Region,Work-Dividing of Industrial Clusters,and the Transformation of Industrial Clusters

Empirical Analysis on the Dynamical Mechanism of Industrial Transfer from the View of New Economic Geography——A Case Study on the Textile Industry

A Research into the Influence of Relative Labor Cost on Gradient Transfer of Industry——Based on the Regional Differences in Labor Productivity

Global Industrial Chain,Regional Wage Gap and Industrial Upgrading

Can low human capital returns drive China's industrial structure upgrading

New Urbanization,Infrastructure Spatial Spillover and Upgrading of Regional Industrial Structure: Based on Empirical Analysis of 16 core cities of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

Effect of Industrial Transfer Policy on the Evolution of Regional Product Structure:Based on the "Double Transfer" Policy in Guangdong Province

Outward Reforming And Inward Opening To Promote Industrial Upgrading

Industrial Upgrade, Adverse Employment Shock and Land Centralization

Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Undertaking Industrial Transfer in Western Region

Transfer of International Manufacturing, Optimal Industrial Linkage and Policy

Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Upgrading from the Perspective of Differences among Countries

Regional industrial transfer in the Jingjinji urban agglomeration, China: An analysis based on a new “transferring area-undertaking area-dynamic process” model