Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effects of double screws system and compressed three canulated screws in treating femoral neck fractures. METHODS From January 2007 to June 2009, the clinical data of 67 patients with femoral neck fractures underwent operation were retrospectively analyzed. There were 38 males and 29 females,aged from 31 to 71 years with an average of 50.6 years, left was in 41 cases and right was in 26 cases. The patients were divided into two groups (group A and B) based on the different fixation method. Of them, 30 cases (group A,19 males and 11 females) were treated with double screws system and 37 cases (group B, 19 males and 18 females) with compressed three canulated screws. In group A, Pauwells angle was more than or equal 50 degrees in 16 cases and Pauwells angle less 50 degrees in 14 cases; in group B, Pauwells angle was more than or equal 50 degrees in 22 cases and Pauwells angle less 50 degrees in 15 cases. Duration of hospitalization, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative time in bed, infection of incision, postoperative complication, quality of fracture reduction, position of internal fixation, incidence of non-union and femoral head necrosis, incidence of failure fixation, joint function (Harris score) were compared between two groups. RESULTS All patients were followed up from 30 to 59 months with an average of 42 months. There was no significant differences in aspect of duration of hospitalization, infection of incision, intraoperative blood loss, walking time, postoperative complications between two groups(P>0.05). Operative time of group A [(31.1 +/- 9.7) min]was less than that of group B [(40.4 +/- 12.7) min] (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in quality of fracture reduction, position of internal fixation, incidence of non-union and femoral head necrosis between two groups (P>0.05). In the patients with Pauwells angle more than or equal 50 degrees in group A, there was no retreated screws, broken screws, screw cut-off from the femoral head;a head;and in group B, retreated screws occurred in 2 cases, screw cut-off from the femoral head occurred in 2 cases, screws not completely getting in femoral head occurred in 2 cases; there was significant differences between two groups (P<0.05). The patients with Pauwells angle less 50 degrees in group A, screw loosening occurred in one case; and in group B, screw retreating occurred in one cases; there was no significant differences between two groups (P>0.05). All patients who suffered from screw loosening, retreating or cut-off from the femoral head were more than 65 years old. There was no significant differences in the joint function between two groups at 6 and 30 months after operations (P>0.05). CONCLUSION Double screws system has advantages of minimal invasion, easy operation, reliable fixation in treatment of femoral neck fractures. Compared with the traditional compressed three canulated screws,double screws system has less fixation failure rate and higher hip function scoring. It has a good clinical effect especially for the patients with Pauwells angle more than or equal 50 degrees.

Three and four cannulated screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study

[Study on biomechanical stability in simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by two cannulated screws].

Short Term Follow-Up after Removal of Internal Fixation after Femoral Neck Fracture Healing in Adults

Comparison of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Effect of hollow screw and suture anchor in treatment of fractures of femoral lesser trochanter in adolescents

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures after the Fixation of Ipsilateral Femoral Shaft by Antegrade Intramedullary Nail

Comparison of Femoral Neck Internal Fixation System and Simple Cannulated Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients under 65 Years Old

[Case-Control Study on Double Screws System and Compressed Three Canulated Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures].

Comparison of physical parameters of two internal fixation devices for femoral neck fractures

Internal fixation and prosthesis selection for the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures

[Analysis of therapeutic effects of cannulated compression screws for the treatment of femoral neck fractures]

Nervous system neoplasms and primary malignancies of other sites

Biomechanical Research of Three Parallel Cannulated Compression Screws in Oblique Triangle Configuration for Fixation of Femoral Neck Unstable Fractures

Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients

Internal fixation system with the pyramid screw head for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

Comparison of Femoral Neck System to Multiple Cancellous Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation with cannulated compression screw for young patients with femoral neck fracture

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Variable Pitch Fully Threaded Headless Screws and Partially Threaded Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Comparison Between Headless Cannulated Screws and Partially Threaded Screws in Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of using an inverted triangular cannulated compression screw in combination with positive or negative buttress reduction for the healing of femoral neck fractures