Abstract:Objective: To assess the diagnostic value of anti-salivary gland protein-1 (SP1) antibody combined with anti-parotid secretory protein (PSP) antibody for Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Methods: A total of 60 patients with primary SS (pSS) who were treated in the outpatient and inpatient department of Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2020 to December 2022 were collected. Thirty patients with other autoimmune diseases accompanied by dry mouth and/or dry eyes were collected as disease control group. Thirty healthy subjects from the physical examination center were collected for healthy control group, serum samples were obtained from all of them. Their general features and clinical information including clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations and other examinations were recorded. The 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria were adopted as the diagnostic standard of pSS. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) subtype of anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody were detected by chemiluminescence immunoassay. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody in diagnosing pSS.The cli-nical characteristics of anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody positive patients and negative patients in pSS group were further compared. Independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test, variance analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Spearman correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: There was no significant difference in age (F=1.406, P=0.495) and gender (χ2=2.105, P=0.349) among pSS group, disease control group and healthy control group. The expression levels of anti-SP1 antibody (H=16.73, P < 0.001) and anti-PSP antibody (H=26.09, P < 0.001) were statistically different among the three groups. An intergroup comparison of anti-SP1 antibody expression levels showed that there was a statistically significant difference between pSS and healthy control group (P < 0.001), but no statistically significant difference between the other groups. Comparison of anti-PSP antibody expression levels between the groups showed that there were statistically significant differences between pSS and healthy control group (P < 0.001), and between disease control group and healthy control group (P=0.009), while no statistically significant differences between the other groups. The positive rate of anti-SP1 antibody in pSS group was significantly higher than that in disease control group and healthy control group (58.33% vs. 40.00% vs. 13.33%, P < 0.001). The positive rate of anti-PSP antibody in pSS group was significantly higher than that in disease control group and healthy control group (75.00% vs. 56.17% vs. 16.67%, P < 0.001). The area under the curve for anti-SP1 antibody was 0.688 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of anti-SP1 antibody were 58.33% (35/60) and 70.00% (42/60) respectively, the positive predictive value was 66.04% (35/53) and the negative predictive value was 54.55% (42/77) of anti-SP1 antibody.The area under the curve of anti-PSP antibody was 0.720 (P < 0.001), with a sensitivity was 75.00% (45/60), and specificity was 63.33% (38/60).The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of anti-PSP antibody were 67.16% (45/67) and 71.70% (38/53) respectively. All the 13 pSS patients were negative for anti-Sjögren's syndrome A (SSA, including SSA52 and SSA60) antibody and anti- Sjögren's syndrome B (SSB) antibody. Among them, 11 patients were positive for both anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody, 1 patient was positive for anti-SP1 antibody and 1 patient was positive for anti-PSP antibody. The clinical features of anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody positive and negative groups were compared in pSS patients. The duration of disease in anti-SP1 antibody positive group was shorter (Z=-2.277, P=0.023) when compared with the negative patients. The patients with positive anti-PSP antibody were younger than those in the negative group (t=2.598, P < 0.05), the positive rate of rheumatoid factor (P=0.002) and the serum level of IgG (t=3.806, P=0.003) in anti-PSP antibody positive group were higher than in the negative group. Analysis of the correlation between anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody in the pSS patients showed that there was significant correlation between them (r=0.801, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Both anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody are valuable in the diagnosis of SS, and anti-SP1 antibody is helpful for the early diagnosis of pSS. The combined detection of anti-SP1 antibody and anti-PSP antibody is helpful for the early diagnosis of pSS patients with negative anti-SSA antibody and anti-SSB antibody.

Value of positive labial salivary glands pathology results in diagnosing Sjǎgren's syndrome

The diagnostic value of anti-SSA antibody in primary Sj(o)gren's syndrome

Importance of salivary gland focus score in the diagnosis of Sj(o)gren's syndrome

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of salivary gland ultrasonography-positive patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome

Expressions and Clinical Significances of SSA Antibody, SSB Antibody and SS56 in Labial Gland Tissues of Patients with Sjogren's Syndrome

OP0185 Characteristics of Primary Sjögren's Syndrome Patients with IGG4-Positive Plasma Cells in Labial Salivary Glands

Characteristics of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome Patients with IgG4 Positive Plasma Cells Infiltration in the Labial Salivary Glands

Correlation of lip histopathology and clinical manifestations in patients with Sj(o)gren's syndrome

Immunophenotypes and clinical features of lymph ocytes in labial gland of patients with primary Sj(o)gren's syndrome

Distribution characteristics of plasma cells in labial glands of patients with Sj(o)gren's syndrome

Histopathological comparison of Sjögren-related features between paired labial and parotid salivary gland biopsies of sicca patients

Quantitative Evaluation of Salivary Gland Scintigraphy in Sjögren's Syndrome: Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy and Relationship with Pathological Features of the Salivary Glands.

Diagnostic utility of submandibular and labial salivary gland biopsy in IgG4-related sialadenitis

Diagnostic Value of Lip Mucosal Impression Cytology and in vivo Confocal Microscopy in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome

[Diagnostic Performances of Salivary Gland Ultrasonography for Sjögren's Syndrome].

Clinical Assessment of Oral Diagnostic Items in 2002 Classification Criteria for Primary Sj(o)gren' S Syndrome

Diagnostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography scoring systems in Sj(o)gren's syndrome

Clinical Characteristics and Labial Gland Pathological Features in Children with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Complicated by Sjögren's Syndrome

[Diagnostic values of anti-salivary gland protein-1 antibody combined with anti-parotid secretory protein antibody for Sjögren's syndrome]

Ultrasonography Predicts the Results of Labial Salivary Gland Biopsy in Patients with Suspected Sjögren’s Syndrome: a Matrix Risk Model

Expression Levels and Clinical Significances of BAFF, MMP-9 and E-cad in Labial Gland Tissues of Patients with Primary Sjogren's Syndrome