Abstract:Project 211 is one of the most important educational policies in China, which aims at selecting a small number of “key universities” for sustainable development in the 21st century. These selected “key universities” have received substantial funding from the government so they can recruit outstanding faculty and be equipped with high quality facilities. Although this national policy has come into being for more than a decade, limited empirical studies have been conducted to examine how the policy influences students’ performance as well as whether the policy is perceived to interfere with test fairness. Using differential item analysis (DIF) and content analysis, this study examined the effect of group membership (key vs. non-key universities) on one of the large-scale high-stakes language tests–the Graduate School Entrance English Examination (GSEEE). The results identified a number of DIF/DBF, all favoring test takers from key universities. A review of the flagged items by three test reviewers found a myriad of potential factors including unbalanced learning opportunities, which may contribute to performance differences between two groups. However, none of the reviewers deemed that unbalanced educational opportunities brought bias and presented a threat to fairness. Fairness in this context is conceptualized to require individuals or groups who are less well-off to sacrifice social benefits and resources to those who are better off to achieve the overarching aim of maximizing economic benefit to the society.

On the Founding of National Education Test Steering Committee

The Combination of Fairness and Science in the Reform of College Entrance Examination

The Trains of Thought,Principles and Policy Suggestions about University Entrance Exam Reform

Retrospect and Prospect of University Entrance Examination

Retrospect of Establishing the College Entrance Examination System:From 1952 to 2012

On the Nature and Phenomena of College Entrance Exmination Competition

An Incident and a Revolution——on Provincial Implementation of College Entrance Exams

The Reform of College Entrance Examination： Priority to Fairness or Efficiency

Where Should the Reform of the New National College Entrance Mathematics Subject Examination Go:From no Distinction to a Little Distinction Between Arts and Sciences

Universities under the Direct Affiliation of the MOE Should Be Distributed in Every Province and Region

The Study of Imperial Examination and the Reform of College Entrance Examination

On the College Entrance Examination Reform under the New Curriculum Reform

Reflections on the History of the Reform of College Entrance Examination

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

On Development from Self-determined Admission to Unified Recruitment in Higher Education Soon after the Establishment of New China

Suggestions on the Enrollment Reform for College Entrance Examination (CEE)

The Differences in Education between China and the Western World and English Teaching and Learning Reform in Colleges

Pursuit of Fairness:Perhaps It is the Root Cause of University Entrance Examination to Make Mistakes

An Initial Attempt to Democratization of Educational Decision-Making——inquiry into Provisional Education-Conference in the Early Republic of China

Do Civic Education Influences Matter? China'S Civic Education And Its Implication To The Transition Of Governance

The Promotion to Integrate Educational Resources by National Self-taught Examination