Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

Whither China: the Discourse and Practice of Property Rights Reform in China

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

Perfecting the Separating Power System in Property Right Reform

An Analysis on the Nature of Chinese Land Property Rights and Its Trajectory of Reform

The Historical Position of Collective Land Ownership

Three Perspectives and Their Integration on Reform of Land Grant System

The Level of Decentralization and Property Rights Protection––a Sociological Analysis of Property Rights

The Ownership Reform in China: What Direction and How Far?

Path Choice for the Reform of Land Property and Its Transfer Policies

Reconstruction of China’s Farmland Rights System Based on the ‘trifurcation of Land Rights’ Reform

Dimensions and Diversity of Property Rights in Rural China: Dilemmas on the Road to Further Reform

A study on the path of the innovation of Chinese rural land system at present on the perspective of property rights——Take Chengdu City as the example

The Normative Structure of "Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft" and the Transfer of Ownership in China

Probing into the Relations Between the Term of Land Use Right and the Integrity of Housing Ownership

On the Study of the Property-right Reform of State-owned Enterprises

“The Separation of Three Rights” of Rural Land and Reform Issues:Policy Track,Text Analysis and Property Reconstrction

The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? - A Perspective on Property Rights

Review on the History of the Equalization of Land Ownership Thought and Its Implication

The Owners under the Property Law of Mainland China

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution

Property in Transition: Conflicts over Ownership in Post-Socialist Shanghai