Mortality and Morbidity Associated with Simultaneous Bilateral or Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis

Jun Hu,Yuan Liu,Zheng Lv,Xiang Li,Xiaodong Qin,Weimin Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1287-4

IF: 2.928

2011-01-01

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Abstract:To evaluate the mortality and postoperative morbidity associated with simultaneous bilateral or staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults with Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis: A Matched Study Protocol.

Zifei Yin,Pingkang Qian,Xiaofeng Wu,Feng Gao,Feng Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000021868

IF: 1.6

2020-01-01

Medicine

Abstract:Background: The choice between unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is likely to have long-term implications for patient-reported health outcomes. However, high-quality studies that compare the outcomes of TKA and UKA and their effects are still lacking in the literature. Thus, the aim of the present study was to compare the UKA and TKA techniques with regard to functional outcomes and perioperative complications in patients who had isolated medial osteoarthritis. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, matched-controlled study performed with approval of our hospital (Kunshan hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), with the ethics number KZY2020-37. To reduce the effect of selection bias and potential confounding in this observational study, a 1:1 matching algorithm was applied. The groups were split by sex, age to within 6 years, and body mass index within 5 kg/m(2). Thus, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 240 consecutively enrolled patients who underwent UKA and 240 patients who underwent TKA from January 2013 to June 2015 from the database of our institution. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects participating in the trial. Clinical outcomes included range of motion, Short Form 12 score, new Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and the complications. The outcome measures were evaluated by a physiotherapist and were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years. The mean follow-up time was 3 years. Conclusion: We hypothesized that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative outcomes.
Simultaneous bilateral and staged total knee arthroplasty combined with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of bilateral knee osteoarthritis: comparison of early clinical outcomes, complications, and prosthesis survival

Kuishuai Xu,Xiang Li,Mingyue Yan,Tianrui Wang,Tengbo Yu,Xia Zhao,Yingze Zhang,Liang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05173-1

2024-10-15

Abstract:Objective: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is usually bilateral. In many patients, the degree of bilateral knee degeneration varies, with one side involving multiple compartments and the other a single compartment degeneration. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the early clinical efficacy of simultaneous bilateral and staged total knee arthroplasty (TKA) combined with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of bilateral KOA with different degrees. Methods: We compared clinical data from 71 simultaneous bilateral TKA/UKA (SB-TKA/UKA) patients with 52 Staged TKA/UKA (Staged-TKA/UKA) patients. Staged-TKA/UKA is defined as TKA on one knee followed by UKA on the other knee. The comparison included Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, range of motion(ROM), complication rate and prosthetic survival rate at the last follow-up between the two groups. Results: The follow-up time of SB-TKA/UKA group was (69.08 ± 14.35) months, and that of Staged-TKA/UKA group was (73.25 ± 18.39) months. Staged-KA/UKA group had a shorter hospital stays, less hospitalization costs and shorter operating time (p < 0.001 for hospital stay, p < 0.001 for hospitalization costs and p < 0.001 for operating time). There were no significant differences in HSS and ROM between the two groups at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups (χ2 = 0.56, p = 0.454). For the TKA-side knee joint, there was no significant difference in the prosthetic survival rate (χ2 = 0.05, p = 0.824) and the prosthetic survival curve (χ2 = 0.052, p = 0.82) between the two groups. For UKA-side knee joint, there was no significant difference in prosthetic survival rate (χ2 = 0.08, p = 0.777) and prosthetic survival curve (χ2 = 0.074, p = 0.786) between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared to Staged-TKA/UKA, SB-TKA/UKA has the same early clinical efficacy, shorter operating time and hospital stays, less hospitalization costs, and no increased postoperative complications and prosthesis revision rates. Therefore, SB-TKA/UKA may be recommended for patients who can tolerate simultaneous bilateral surgery as assessed before surgery.
Beyond one step: unveiling optimal approach for bilateral knee arthroplasty - a comprehensive meta-analysis

Clevio Desouza,Vijay Shetty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05454-8

2024-07-22

Abstract:Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficient and common procedure used to treat advanced osteoarthritis of the knee. Geriatric patients make up the majority of TKA patients. For the surgical management of bilateral knee arthritis, there is still debate regarding whether to do a simultaneous or staged TKA. We through this study have gathered data and aimed to assess the safety of simultaneous bilateral TKA in patients. Materials and methods: We conducted a study according to the PRISMA guidelines by searching through various databases for the following search terms: total knee arthroplasty (TKA), complications following TKA, bilateral TKA, and bilateral vs. unilateral TKA. The search included case series and clinical trials and excluded review articles, yielding 24 articles from the original search. We extracted data upon the outcomes in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA. We performed additional bias assessments to validate our search algorithm and results. Results: One hundred and three published articles were identified, and twenty-four that included a total of 2, 18,385 patients were included in the meta-analysis. 93,074 patients underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA and 125,311 patients underwent staged bilateral TKA. Simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with significantly increased mortality rate (P < 0.00001, Odd's ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.26), increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (P < 0.00001, OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.30-1.91), deep venous thrombosis (P < 0.00001, OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17-1.46), and neurological complications (P < 0.002, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.82). There were no significant differences in cardiac complications between both the procedures (P = 0.60, OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.23). Conclusion: Staged bilateral TKA is associated with less complication rates as compared to simultaneous bilateral TKA. Hence, patients should be counselled and selected based on the risks respective to each strategy.
Simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Akam Ramezani,Amirhossein Ghaseminejad Raeini,Amirmohammad Sharafi,Mehrdad Sheikhvatan,Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi,Seyyed Hossein Shafiei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03281-4

IF: 2.6

2022-08-14

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:Total hip arthroplasty is a common orthopedic surgery for treating primary or secondary hip osteoarthritis. Bilateral total hip replacement could be performed in a single stage or two separate stages. Each surgical procedure's reliability, safety, and complications have been reported controversially. This study aimed to review the current evidence regarding the outcomes of simultaneous and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

orthopedics
Similar complication and readmission rates following simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty

Evangelos Tyrpenou,Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos,Laura Epure,Olga Huk-Papanastassiou,David Zukor,John Antoniou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03734-4

Abstract:Purpose: To compare short-term complications and readmission rates, in patients treated with simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) within a year from the index procedure. Methods: We reviewed the charts of patients that underwent simultaneous and staged-within a year-bilateral THA, between 2016 and 2020. Preoperative baseline characteristics were evaluated, while differences in terms of 30-day major and 30-day minor complications and readmission rates were compared between the groups. Results: One-hundred-sixty patients (mean age, 64.3 years; SD, ± 11.7) were identified. Seventy-nine patients were treated with simultaneous (Group A) and eighty-one patients with staged (Group B) THA. There were no differences in baseline characteristic between the two groups (p > 0.050). Group A was more likely to receive general anesthesia (43% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001) and had longer total operative time (182.8 vs. 128.0 min, p < 0.001). Group A had an overall shorter total length of hospital stay (5.8 vs. 8.6 days, p < 0.001). No differences in transfusion rates (p = 0.229) and no differences in major and minor complications (p > 0.05) were identified. Postoperative visits at the emergency department or readmissions were similar between the two groups (p > 0.050). Conclusion: This study shows that similar complication and readmission rates are expected after simultaneous and staged THA. Simultaneous bilateral THA is a safe and effective procedure, that should be considered for patients that present with radiologic and clinical bilateral hip disease.
Cost analysis of staged versus simultaneous bilateral total knee and hip arthroplasty using a propensity score matching

Ji-Fei Hou,Chuan Hu,Yun Zhang,Li-Qi Tian,Yan-Zheng Liu,Chi Zhang,Jing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041147

IF: 3.006

2021-03-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Background Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), is required for many patients. This study aimed to evaluate the medical costs, length of stay (LOS), blood transfusion and in-hospital complications in patients undergoing simultaneous and staged TJA. Methods All patients who underwent primary bilateral TJA from 2013 to 2018 in our institute were included. The propensity score matching analysis was performed between simultaneous and staged TJA patients. The difference in medical costs, LOS, blood transfusion and in-hospital complications was compared between simultaneous and staged groups. Results Except for materials fees and general therapy fees, medical costs (bed fees, general therapy fees, nursing care fees, check-up and laboratory test fees, surgical fees and drug fees) were significantly lower in the simultaneous TKA, THA and TJA group. The total average medical costs in simultaneous and staged TKA groups were $15 385 and $16 729 (p<0.001), respectively; THA groups were $14 503 and $16 142 (p=0.016), respectively; TJA groups were $15 389 and $16 830 (p<0.001), respectively. The highest and lowest costs were materials fees and nursing care fees. No significant differences were found for five common comorbidities and postoperative complications between the two subgroups. The simultaneous groups had a shorter LOS and the differences from the staged group for TKA, THA and the TJA group were 8, 6 and 8 days, respectively. The incidence of blood transfusion is higher for simultaneous groups and the difference from the staged group for TKA, THA and TJA is 32.69%, 18% and 29.3%, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that simultaneous TKA and THA with a shorter LOS would cost fewer (costs incurred during hospitalisation) than staged TKA and THA. Complication rates were not affected by the choice for staged or simultaneous arthroplasty, but the incidence of blood transfusion was higher in the simultaneous groups.

medicine, general & internal
Postoperative Complications and Cost-effectiveness of Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modified Minimally Invasive Two-incision Technique

Jong Hwan Seol,Kyung Soon Park,Taek Rim Yoon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2015.27.2.77

2015-01-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness of simultaneous and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA), using a minimally invasive two-incision technique.MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 206 patients who underwent simultaneous or staged bilateral THA using a modified, minimally invasive two-incision between January 2004 and November 2009 were registered and divided into a simultaneous bilateral THA group (group A, 147 patients) and staged bilateral THA group (group B: 59 patients). Staged THA was performed on group B with interval of at least 2 months between the initial and second surgery. Clinical evaluations, amount of blood loss, need for transfusion, complications and costeffectiveness were compared.RESULTS: Perioperative morbidity rates were similar in the two groups (P=0.546) and overall complications were not significant between the groups. Average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (average 14.6 days vs. 25.3 days; P<0.001). Total medical cost was significantly higher in group B than in group A (average 9,236 US dollars vs. 11,163 US dollars). Patients in group A required more blood transfusions than those in group B (3.02 vs. 1.90 units; P=0.003), although blood loss in the two groups were similar (892 vs. 917 ml P=0.613).CONCLUSION: Comparison of intra- and postoperative complications support the conclusion that simultaneous bilateral THA compares favorably with staged THA in terms of outcomes, complications and cost-effectiveness.
Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in a One-Stage Procedure Versus Two-Stage Procedure: A Retrospective Study

Giada Accatino,Alessandra Monzio Compagnoni,Federico Alberto Grassi,Alberto Castelli,Gianluigi Pasta,Francesco Benazzo,Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi,Eugenio Jannelli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181902

2024-09-23

Abstract:Background/Objectives: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the safety and functional outcomes of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to two-stage bilateral TKA procedures. Osteoarthritis is the leading cause of knee joint replacement globally, so we sought to determine whether the one-stage approach could be deemed non-inferior to the two-stage method in terms of perioperative complications and postoperative recovery. Methods: We analyzed two cohorts: 43 patients underwent one-stage bilateral TKA, while 66 patients received two-stage TKA. The data collected included demographic details, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes assessed by the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), European Quality of Life, and Visual Analogue Scale scores at preoperative and five years postoperative follow-ups. Results: The results showed statistically significant improvements in quality-of-life measures for both groups, with the one-stage group exhibiting greater enhancement in OKS (p < 0.05). Complication rates were similar across both procedures, with no significant differences in infection rates or other adverse events. Conclusions: This study suggests that the one-stage approach to treat bilateral knee arthritis could reduce subjective stress and healthcare costs, presenting a safe alternative for appropriately selected patients. However, the findings highlight the necessity of considering patients' overall health status when planning surgical interventions. Further research involving larger populations is recommended to validate our conclusions.
[Comparison of early effectiveness and safety of simultaneous and staged bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for bilateral anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis]

Zhiyuan Su,Juncai Liu,Xiangtian Deng,Yunong Ao,Daiqing Wei,Yun Luo,Zhong Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.201810030

2019-07-15

Abstract:Objective: To compare the early effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral and staged bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in treatment of anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis. Methods: The clinical data of 31 patients with bilateral anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis who underwent bilateral UKAs between January 2015 and January 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. Of them, 17 patients were treated with simultaneous bilateral UKAs (simultaneous group) and 14 patients with staged bilateral UKAs (staged group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, osteoarthritis grading, and preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, knee society score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and range of motion (ROM) of knee between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, blood loss, hospitalization stay, minimum hemoglobin value during 10 days after operation, and hospitalization cost were recorded. The staged group was compared by the sum of two operations. The effectiveness was evaluated by KSS score, VAS score, ROM at 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and patient satisfaction scores were recorded at 12 months after operation. Results: The operation time, hospitalization stay, and hospitalization cost of the simultaneous group were significantly lower than those of the staged group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in blood loss and the minimum hemoglobin value during 10 days after operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). Superficial infection occurred in 1 side of 1 case (7.1%) in staged group. Postoperative delirium occurred in 1 case (5.9%) in simultaneous group. There was no significant difference in incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups ( P=1.000). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-32 months (mean, 24.7 months). There was no significant difference in KSS score between the two groups at 3 months after operation ( t=0.896, P=0.392). KSS scores were significanly higher in simultaneous group than in staged group at 6 and 12 months after operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ROM and VAS scores between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in simultaneous group than in staged group ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed no loosening of the prosthesis in the two groups. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral UKAs has the same security as staged bilateral UKAs. Meanwhile knee function recovery was better, hospitalization stay and hospitalization cost reduced, and patient satisfaction was higher in simultaneous bilateral UKAs.
No differences in terms of complications, readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported outcomes in simultaneous bilateral versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty in selected patients

Edoardo Franceschetti,Stefano Campi,Pietro Gregori,Giancarlo Giurazza,Kristian Samuelsson,Michael T Hirschmann,Alice Laudisio,Giuseppe Francesco Papalia,Biagio Zampogna,Rocco Papalia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2023.11.013

IF: 2.423

2024-02-24

The Knee

Abstract:Background The safety and the clinical success of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare complications and patient-reported outcomes following simultaneous BTKA (simBTKA) versus staged BKTA (staBTKA) in patients affected by bilateral symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Data from patients who underwent simBTKA or staBTKA at a single institution from January 2017 to December 2020, with a minimum 1-year follow up period were retrospectively collected. Differences in terms of complications and clinical success were compared among the simBTKA and staBTKA patient groups. Alpha was set at 0.05. Results A total of 173 patients were included in this study. The results revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mortality, revision rate, readmission rate, local and systemic complications and patient-reported outcomes. SimBTKA group had a shorter operating room time (96 (73–119) vs. 195 (159–227); P < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay (4 (3–5) vs. 7 (6–9); P < 0.0001) compared with the staBTKA group. Conclusions SimBTKA performed in a selected patient population at a high-volume center can be considered comparable to staBTKA in terms of safety, postoperative complications, 30-day readmissions and patient satisfaction. Consequently, reduced operating room time and hospital stay renders simBTKA a cost-effective and advantageous option, not only for patients, but also for healthcare institutes. Furthermore, the current study also highlights the importance of correct patient selection based on clinical preoperative characteristics.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty has higher in-hospital complications than both staged surgeries: a nationwide propensity score matched analysis of 38,764 cases

Michael Erossy,Ahmed K. Emara,Guangjin Zhou,Siran Kourkian,Alison K. Klika,Robert M. Molloy,Nicolas S. Piuzzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03248-5

2022-03-31

Abstract:PurposeTo investigate (1) healthcare utilization, (2) in-hospital metrics and (3) total in-hospital costs associated with simultaneous versus staged BTKA while evaluating staged BTKA as a single process consisting of two combined episodes.MethodsThe national readmissions database was reviewed for simultaneous and staged (two primary unilateral TKAs12 months apart) BTKA patients (2016–2017). A total of 19,382 simultaneous BTKAs were identified, and propensity score matched (1:1) to staged BTKA patients (19,382 patients; 38,764 surgeries) based on demographics, comorbidities, and socioeconomic determinants. Outcomes included healthcare utilization [length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition], in-hospital periprosthetic fractures, non-mechanical complications, and costs. Staged BTKA was evaluated as one process consisting of two episodes. For each staged patient, continuous outcomes were evaluated via the sum of both episodes. Categorical outcomes were added, and percents were expressed relative to total number of surgeries (n = 38,764).ResultsSimultaneous BTKA had longer LOS (5.0 days ± 4.7 vs. 4.5 days ± 3.5; p < 0.001), higher non-home discharge [36.9% (n = 7150/19,382) vs. 13.6% (n = 5451/38,764)], in-hospital periprosthetic fractures [0.13% (26/19,382) vs. 0.08% (31/38,764); p = 0.049], any non-mechanical complication [33.76% (6543/19,382) vs.15.93% (6177/38,764); p < 0.0001], hematoma/seroma formation [0.11% (22/19,382) vs. 0.05% (20/38,764); p = 0.0088], wound disruption [0.08% (16/19,382) vs. 0.04% (16/38,764); p = 0.0454], and any infection [1.13% (219/19,382) vs. 0.50% (194/38,764); p < 0.0001]. Average in-hospital costs for the two staged BTKA episodes combined were $5006 higher than those of simultaneous BTKA ($28,196 ± $18,488 vs. $33,202 ± $15,240; p < 0.001).ConclusionSimultaneous BTKA had higher healthcare utilization and in-hospital complications than both episodes of staged BTKA combined, with a minimal in-hospital cost savings. Future studies are warranted to further explore patient selection who would benefit from BTKA.
Simultaneous (two‐surgeon) versus staged bilateral knee arthroplasty: an observational study of intraoperative and post‐operative outcomes

Stephen D. Gill,Leaha‐Marie Hill‐Buxton,Stella May Gwini,Stewart Morrison,Brett Moreira,Sally Beattie,Andrew Thomson,Richard S. Page

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15766

IF: 1.7

2020-02-27

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Abstract:BackgroundThe advantages of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (sim‐BTKA) remain controversial. This study investigated the effects of two‐surgeon sim‐BTKA compared to separate admission staged BTKA regarding intraoperative and post‐operative outcomes and health service costs. MethodsPatients underwent sim‐BTKA or staged BTKA between 1 November 2008 and 30 June 2016. Data were extracted from a joint replacement registry and medical records. Median regression and chi‐squared tests were used for between‐group comparisons. ResultsMedian hospital total length of stay was 5 days less for sim‐BTKA (n = 122) than staged BTKA group (n = 46) (7 versus 12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9, 6.1), and 9 days less for inpatient rehabilitation (17 versus 26; 95% CI 3.7, 14.3). However, 80% of sim‐BTKA patients went to inpatient rehabilitation (versus 27% following staged BTKA), so median total length of stay was 9 days less for staged BTKA (13 versus 22; 95% CI −12.8, −5.2). Total anaesthesia time was 135 min less for sim‐BTKA (P < 0.001), while staged BTKA required less blood transfusions (P = 0.001). Complication rates were similar, except for superficial infections which were observed twice as often after staged BTKA (30% versus 15%, P = 0.048). Twelve months following sim‐BTKA and the first staged total knee arthroplasty, sim‐BTKA had better WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores (P ≤ 0.05). Average inpatient costs (hospital and rehabilitation) were $6388 less for sim‐BTKA. ConclusionSim‐BTKA appears to be a comparatively safe alternative to staged BTKA. Sim‐BTKA may be superior to staged BTKA due to faster improvements in pain and function and lower healthcare costs. How these results generalize to other health services requires further investigation.

surgery
The mid-term outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient

Jinlong Ma,Liang Zhang,Cui Wang,Kuishuai Xu,Zhongkai Ren,Tianrui Wang,Yingze Zhang,Xia Zhao,Tengbo Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1033830

IF: 1.8

2023-01-25

Frontiers in Surgery

Abstract:Objective To compare the mid-term outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) that was performed in one knee and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed in the other knee in the same stage. Methods This is a retrospective study. A total of 63 patients (126 knees) scheduled for one-stage knee surgery due to osteoarthritis of both knees were selected, and all patients underwent one-stage mobile platform UKA and TKA of the other knee. Differences in general clinical data, functional recovery, complications, and prosthesis revision rates were assessed after UKA and TKA, respectively. The evaluation indicators for knee joint function recovery included the hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), Joint Forgotten Score (JFS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Visual analog scale (VAS). Patient preference between UKA and TKA was also recorded. Results During a mean follow-up of 76.95 months (range, 65.00 to 87.00 months), there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups ( P = 0.299); however, the prosthesis revision rate was higher in the UKA group than in the TKA group ( P = 0.023). The incision length, operation time, blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume in the UKA group were significantly ( P < 0.001) lower than those in the TKA group: JFS, ROM, and VAS in the UKA group were higher than those in the TKA group ( P < 0.001, P = 0.023, P = 0.032), HSS and KOOS in TKA group were significantly ( P < 0.001) higher than those in UKA group. At the last follow-up, 40% and 24% of patients preferred TKA and UKA, respectively. Conclusions TKA was found to be superior to UKA in terms of HSS, KOOS, and VAS, while UKA had more significant advantages in terms of less surgical trauma, better ROM, and higher JFS. Complications were not different between groups, but UKA had a higher rate of prosthesis revision. After a follow-up of at least 5 years, more patients preferred TKA.

surgery
To Stage or Not to Stage? Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, and Discharge Disposition After Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Ryan Cheng,Yasoda Mantena,Yu-Fen Chiu,Cynthia A. Kahlenberg,Mark P. Figgie,Daniel A. Driscoll

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.011

IF: 4.435

2024-01-12

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract:Background Patients who have bilateral hip arthritis can be treated with bilateral total hip arthroplasty (bTHA) in either a staged or simultaneous fashion. The goal of this study was to determine whether staged and simultaneous posterior bTHA patients differ in regard to: 1) patient-reported outcome measures; 2) 90-day complication rates; and 3) discharge dispositions and cumulative lengths of stay. Methods Patients who: 1) underwent simultaneous bTHA or staged bTHA (within 12 months) using the posterior approach, and 2) completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR.) surveys were included in the study. A total of 266 patients (87 simultaneous bTHA and 179 staged bTHA) were included. Chart review was performed to collect patient-level variables, postoperative complications, discharge dispositions, and lengths of stay. Results Staged bTHA patients had higher HOOS JR, Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), and Veterans RAND 12-Item (VR-12) Health Survey physical component scores compared to simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery ( P =0.019, 0.006, and 0.008, respectively), but these differences did not meet the minimal clinically important difference threshold for any questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA was associated with higher rate of periprosthetic fractures ( P =0.034) and discharge to a location other than home ( P <0.001). Conclusion There were statistically significant, but likely not clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes for staged and simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the higher periprosthetic fracture risk and greater likelihood of discharge to a rehabilitation facility associated with simultaneous bTHA. Further research should aim to understand which patients may benefit most from simultaneous bTHA.

orthopedics
No Difference in Perioperative Complications for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Staged at 1 Week Compared With Delayed Staging

Mitchell A. Johnson,Stephen R. Barchick,Yehuda E. Kerbel,Ryan D. DeAngelis,Brian Velasco,Charles L. Nelson,Craig L. Israelite

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00135

2022-10-09

Abstract:Controversy exists regarding the safety of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus two TKA procedures staged months apart in patients with bilateral knee arthritis. Here, we investigated a third option: bilateral TKA staged 1 week apart. In this study, we examined the rate of complications in patients undergoing bilateral TKA staged at 1 week compared with longer time intervals.
No Difference in 30-day Mortality Between Patients Undergoing Bilateral Simultaneous Total Knee Arthroplasty With Technology Assistance Compared to Conventional Instrumentation

Jordan S Cohen,Amil R Agarwal,Alex Gu,Andrew Harris,Matthew J Kinnard,Gregory J Golladay,Savyasachi C Thakkar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231160155

Abstract:Background: Bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (BSTKA) has decreased in frequency due to concerns about higher rates of early mortality and complications than unilateral or staged surgeries. Purpose: We sought to evaluate whether technology assistance (encompassing robotics and computer assistance) decreases early mortality following BSTKA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a national all-payer claims database. Patients who underwent BSTKA from October 2015 to December 2020 were identified. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to compare outcomes in patients who underwent BSTKA with technology assistance compared to conventional instrumentation. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were respiratory failure and fat embolism. A post-hoc analysis was performed to evaluate length of stay, readmission, and other medical complications. Results: A total of 14,870 patients who underwent BSTKA were included in this study. Of these, 860 patients underwent technology-assisted BSTKA, and 14,010 patients underwent BSTKA without technology assistance. After a multivariable analysis, patients who underwent technology-assisted BSTKA had equivalent odds of 30-day mortality compared to those who underwent BSTKA without technology assistance. Technology assistance was not protective against the development of acute respiratory failure or fat embolism. Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study found no differences in the rates of 30-day mortality, respiratory failure, or fat embolism after technology-assisted BSTKA compared to conventional BSTKA. On the post-hoc analysis, technology use was associated with a decreased length of stay, lower readmission risk, and decreased rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and blood transfusion.
Thrombotic events in patients underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with modern perioperative blood management strategy

Sachiyuki Tsukada,Masayoshi Saito,Hiroyuki Ogawa,Masahiro Nishino,Naoyuki Hirasawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05624-8

IF: 2.928

2024-12-04

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Abstract:Thrombotic events, the leading cause of death after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), occurred more frequently in simultaneous bilateral TKA than unilateral TKA under conventional perioperative management. The aim of the study was to determine whether the simultaneous bilateral TKA using contemporary blood management strategies would be associated with higher risk of thrombotic events than unilateral TKA.

surgery,orthopedics
The Financial Feasibility of Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analyses of Revenue and Contribution Margin between Simultaneous and Staged Procedures

Itay Ashkenazi,Vinaya Rajahraman,Kyle W. Lawrence,Claudette M. Lajam,Joseph A. Bosco,Ran Schwarzkopf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.026

IF: 4.435

2024-01-19

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract:Introduction Financial analyses of simultaneous versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (simBTKA and staBTKA, respectively) have shown improved cost-effectiveness of simBTKA, though revenue and contribution margin (CM) for these procedures have not been investigated. Our analyses compared surgical outcomes, revenues, and CMs between simBTKA and staBTKA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent simBTKA (both procedures done on the same day) and staBTKA (procedures done on a different day within one year) between 2012 and 2021. Patients were 1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. Surgical outcomes, as well as revenue, cost, and CM of the inpatient episode were compared between groups. Of the 2,357 patients evaluated (n=595 simBTKA, n=1,762 staBTKA), 410 were included in final matched analyses (205 per group). Results Total ( P <0.001) and direct ( P <0.001) costs were significantly lower for simBTKA procedures compared to overall costs of both staBTKA procedures. Significantly lower revenue for simBTKA procedures ( P <0.001), resulted in comparable CM between groups ( P =0.477). Postoperative complications including 90-day readmission ( P =1.000), 90-day revision ( P =1.000) and all-cause revision at latest follow-up ( P =0.083) were similar between groups. Conclusion In our propensity-matched cohort, lower costs for simBTKA compared to staBTKA were matched by lower revenues, with a resulting similar CM between procedures. Given that postoperative complication rates were similar, both procedures had comparable cost-effectiveness. Future research is needed to identify patients for whom simBTKA may represent a better surgical intervention compared to staBTKA with respect to clinical and patient reported outcomes.

orthopedics
[Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement for the Patients with Serious Rheumatoid Disease].

H Lu,Y Yuan,B Kou

1995-01-01

Abstract:This retrospective study reviews 57 patients with serious rheumatoid disease who had bilateral total knee arthroplasties simultanneously between 1987 and 1994. The short follow-up results revealed that there was no increase in complications in the patients with simultaneous bilateral procedures, and nearly identical postoperative results to those observed among patients with single joint replacement. Advantage of simultaneous bilateral total arthroplasty include reduction in hospital cost, the need for less invasive surgical event and the ability to rehabilitate the patient symmetrically.
Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Postoperative Complications Following Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Alex Gu,Shitong Wu,Fabio Mancino,Jiabin Liu,Michael P Ast,Matthew P Abdel,Peter K Sculco,Michael P. Ast,Matthew P. Abdel,Peter K. Sculco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1695766

2019-08-30

The Journal of Knee Surgery

Abstract:Abstract For patients who qualify, simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a viable option for the treatment of bilateral symptoms. However, the incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been steadily rising over the past few decades and may impact those who qualify as candidates for bilateral TKA. As such, the aim of this study was to determine the impact of COPD on postoperative outcomes in patients who receive simultaneous bilateral TKA. A retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing data provided through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. All patients who had undergone simultaneous bilateral TKA between 2007 and 2016 were identified and further stratified into groups based upon the COPD status. Incidence of adverse events after TKA in the acute postoperative period was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. COPD was found to be an independent risk factor for the development of major (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5; p = 0.015), renal (OR: 5.1; p = 0.02), and thromboembolic complications (OR: 2.5; p = 0.027). In addition, patients with COPD were at increased risk for having an extended hospital length of stay (LOS; p < 0.001) and development of urinary tract infections (p < 0.001). Patients with COPD are at higher risk for development of overall major complications, as well as renal and thromboembolic complications after simultaneous bilateral TKA. Interestingly, patients were not at increased risk for the development of pulmonary or wound complications. When considering a staged versus simultaneous bilateral TKA, surgeons should be aware of the impact COPD status has on the postoperative complication rate.

Mortality and Morbidity Associated with Simultaneous Bilateral or Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults with Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis: A Matched Study Protocol.

Simultaneous bilateral and staged total knee arthroplasty combined with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of bilateral knee osteoarthritis: comparison of early clinical outcomes, complications, and prosthesis survival

Beyond one step: unveiling optimal approach for bilateral knee arthroplasty - a comprehensive meta-analysis

Simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Similar complication and readmission rates following simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty

Cost analysis of staged versus simultaneous bilateral total knee and hip arthroplasty using a propensity score matching

Postoperative Complications and Cost-effectiveness of Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modified Minimally Invasive Two-incision Technique

Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in a One-Stage Procedure Versus Two-Stage Procedure: A Retrospective Study

[Comparison of early effectiveness and safety of simultaneous and staged bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for bilateral anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis]

No differences in terms of complications, readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported outcomes in simultaneous bilateral versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty in selected patients

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty has higher in-hospital complications than both staged surgeries: a nationwide propensity score matched analysis of 38,764 cases

Simultaneous (two‐surgeon) versus staged bilateral knee arthroplasty: an observational study of intraoperative and post‐operative outcomes

The mid-term outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient

To Stage or Not to Stage? Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, and Discharge Disposition After Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

No Difference in Perioperative Complications for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Staged at 1 Week Compared With Delayed Staging

No Difference in 30-day Mortality Between Patients Undergoing Bilateral Simultaneous Total Knee Arthroplasty With Technology Assistance Compared to Conventional Instrumentation

Thrombotic events in patients underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with modern perioperative blood management strategy

The Financial Feasibility of Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analyses of Revenue and Contribution Margin between Simultaneous and Staged Procedures

[Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement for the Patients with Serious Rheumatoid Disease].

Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Postoperative Complications Following Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty