Abstract:Objective: We propose a novel method to compare directed networks by decomposing the network into small modules, the so-called network subgraph approach, which is distinct from the network motif approach because it does not depend on null model assumptions. Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Results:: We identified and examined the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks with the smallest HJS values. The two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some studies have provided experimental data supporting the 5-node regulatory modules. result: We identify and examine the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks which have the smallest HJS values. These two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some literature studies provide experimental data to support the 5-node regulatory modules. Conclusion: Our method is an alignment-free approach that measures the topological similarity of 5-node regulatory modules and aligns two directed networks based on their topology. These modules capture complex interactions among multiple genes that cannot be detected using existing methods that only consider single-gene relations. We analyzed the biological relevance of the regulatory modules and used the subgraph method to identify the modules that shared the same topology across 2 cancer networks out of 17 cancer networks. We validated our findings using evidence from the literature.

An Algorithm for Finding Hamilton Subgraph in Biological Network

An Algebra Approach for Finding Frequent Subgraphs with Hamiltonian Cycle.

A New Method for Motif Mining in Biological Networks

An Algorithm for Network Motif Discovery in Biological Networks

Biological network motif detection: principles and practice

An Algorithm for Frequent Pattern Mining in Biological Networks

A Greedy Mining Algorithm for Highly Connected Subgraphs

Evaluation of subgraph searching algorithms detecting network motif in biological networks

Biological Network Motif Detection and Evaluation.

Integrating Functional and Topological Properties to Identify Biological Network Motif in Protein Interaction Networks

Non-Treelike Network Motif Detection Algorithm

An Efficient Algorithm for Detecting Closed Frequent Subgraphs in Biological Networks

Algorithm for detecting complete sub-graph in complex network

CoClique:mining Frequent Correlated-Quasi-cliques from Biology Network

Algorithms for Subgraph Isomorphism in Graph Pattern Mining

Pattern mining across massive biological networks for functional discovery

Detecting list-colored graph motifs in biological networks using branch-and-bound strategy

A linear delay algorithm for enumerating all connected induced subgraphs

Parallel Subgraph Matching on Massive Graphs

Network Subgraph-based Method: Alignment-free Technique for Molecular Network Analysis

Identification of Important Nodes in Directed Biological Networks: a Network Motif Approach.