A Study on Unlawfulness in German Civil Law

ZHOU You-jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2007.01.020
2007-01-01
Abstract:Since Rudolf von Jhering,a German legal scholar,advanced that unlawfulness is different from wrong, his notion has dominated German legislative and theoretical areas.Though some scholars doubt the meaning of the dif- ferentiation,it is still necessary to have the two distinguished.In German civil law,three doctrines prevail about the judgment of unlawfulness:consequence unlawfulness,act unlawfulness and the depend-on(compromise)doctrine.In comparison,the last one has more merits than the first two.However,adoption of th“depend-on”doctrine is prem- ised on the differentiation of active tort and negative tort,and of direct tort and indirect tort.The depend-on doctrine may also lead to obscurity and overlapping of criteria for the judgment of tort or unlawfulness.This,however,does not necessarily mean that we must distinguish“intrinsic care”from“external care.”
What problem does this paper attempt to address?