Differences of Head-up Tilt Test in Age and Gender and Nursing Strategy: A Report of 760 Cases

何平,何芝香,王成,李茗香,林萍,谢振武
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2009.23.017
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the age and gender differences of head-up tilt test (HUTT) and institute strategy of nursing.Methods Some 760 patients with unexplained dizziness,syncope,headache or chest distress,318 males,442 females,aged 3.1-70.0 with an average of (21.7 ± 15.7),were enrolled in this study,of which 464 were younger than 18 years old (children group),295 were 18 years old or above (adult group).HUTT was performed in all patients and the strategy of nursing was instituted for each.Results (1) Among all the 760 patients,HUTT was found to be positive in 397 (52.24%).The positive rate was lower in adult group than in children group (P0.05),and lower in males than in females in children group ((P0.05) ;No gender differences was found in adult group (P0.05).(2) The time of HUTT positive reaction in children group was significantly shorter than that in adult group [(21.8 ± 10.4)min vs.(26.3 ± 13.0)min] (P0.05).There ' s no statistical differences between two groups in sublingual nitroglycerin head-up tilt table test (SNHUT) stage (P0.05).(3) There were 22 (2.89%) patients whose heart rate ≤ 40/min and 67 (8.82%) whose blood pressure can not be measured.(4) Among 247 patients who took sublingual nitroglycerin administration,no significant adverse effect was found.Conclusion There were certain age and gender differences in HUTT.Some risk existed during inducing episode of syncope,but it was safe to observe vital sign change in HUTT-positive response and take up promptly effective nursing intervention.It should be emphasized to focus on the fast changing characteristics of HUTT performance in children and females.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?