Dermatology in Britain in the late nineteenth century
A. Rook
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1979.tb03564.x
IF: 11.113
1979-01-01
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:In 1890, the editor ofthe Lancet (i) wrote, 'The narrowness ofthe mere specialist is to be guarded against in all departments of medicine'. His target on this occasion was the gynaecologist, but all the specialists, medical and surgical, had been equally vigorously attacked over many years, and it was only since about 1880 that the specialists had been gaining recognition and respectability in Britain. Most ofthe important appointments in dermatology were held by men who were also physicians or surgeons to leading general hospitals and the few men on the staff of a teaching hospital who confined their practice to dermatology had previously had extensive experience in general medicine or surgery. The majority of those who had turned to dermatology soon after graduating were associated strongly and often exclusively with one ofthe many special hospitals for skin diseases. In 1900 William Osier, then professor of medicine at Baltimore, in an oration (2) at the Medical Graduates' College and Polyclinic in Chenies Street, London, said, 'One of the best features of British medicine has been the practice of specialities by general surgeons and physicians'. Osier may have wished to flatter Jonathan Hutchinson, the founder of the Polyclinic, who was present, but he was expressing an attitude to specialization which is still to some degree maintained in Britain, where a postgraduate higher qualification in internal medicine is still regarded as an essential preliminary to a formal training in dermatology. This essay will consider the state of dermatology in Britain between 1890 and 1900, the background and training of those men who practised this speciality, and the growth during that decade of the organisations which were to shape its future development.