Energy signature technology and its application on energy flux in mangrove ecosystems:a review and outlook

HUANG Zhen-Yuan,WANG Mao,WANG Wen-Qing

2007-01-01

Acta Ecologica Sinica

Abstract:A central view of tropical estuarine ecology is that export of organic matter from mangroves represents a major energy pathway and support much of the secondary production of estuaries and nearshore waters. Nevertheless, recent results, especially those obtained using energy signature technology, contradict this paradigm. Overall, most studies found a limited role of mangrove detritus in estuarine food webs. Usually only animals collected inside mangrove swamps or in mangrove-lined waterways have depleted carbon isotopic signatures characteristic of mangrove detritus. These findings are explicable by the difficulty in assimilation of mangrove carbon and the dilution effect of the tides. These factors, however, cannot explain the heavy use of mangroves in estuarine habitats when other primary production sources are scarce.Algae and other primary production sources (e.g. seagrass) have much higher productivity than mangrove in estuaries and nearshore waters, and are easy to obtain and digest. So these alternative carbon sources and the complicated food web structure mask the nutrition role of mangroves. If this hypothesis is true then it could offer an explanation for the observation that mangrove litter is heavily used by consumers when other primary production sources are scarce, a phenomenon that cannot be explained by the difficulty in assimilation or tidal dilution. Energy signature technology addresses the relative contribution of mangroves to the consumer's carbon sources, not the biomass in numbers. Energy signature technology addresses the relative proportion of the assimilated carbon from mangrove to all the consumer carbon, not the biomass in numbers. The traditional view is that mangrove primary production supports large consumer biomass but not the relative proportion. With that in mind energy signature technology is not inconsistent with the traditional view but is complementary. We hypothesize that all of mangrove litter production is used by aquatic consumers. The mode of the use is, however, not in terms of dominance in the consumer(s tissue but small contributions to many individuals.One blemish of past isotopic studies is that none has directly tested the applicability of the approach to food web links between consumer and mangrove. Another blemish is that what isotopic data indicated was the proportion of the assimilated carbon from mangrove to all the consumer carbon, not its importance. For example algae could get into food webs directly through consumption by all kinds of fishes but mangrove litter must be consumed by crabs first and then perhaps by fish. So in fish tissue there will be much less carbon from mangrove than from algae if the initial primary production in terms of carbon mass of mangrove and algae is equal. Because the carbon mass of mangrove is much reduced after crab digestion and absorption. Digestion and absorption will affect the importance of different carbon sources too, but this issue has been ignored in past studies. The study of energy flux in mangrove ecosystems only focused on particulate organic matter but has ignored dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which is the dominant form of carbon exported from mangroves. N and P export is also important.It is apparent that mangrove litter is not the main source of primary production fuelling the food chains in estuaries and nearshore waters. Isotope signature technology is not yet a perfect tool for studying these trophic linkages, but the imperfection is in the details.