In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Levofloxacin Sustained-Release Capsules.

Li-Fang Yin,Shi-Jing Huang,Shu-Guang Jiang,Chun-Jie Zhao,Zhi-Qiang Pei,Qiang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2010.489562
IF: 3.727
2010-01-01
Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
Abstract:Objective: To reduce the frequency of administration and improve patient compliance, novel levofloxacin sustained-release capsules with suitable in vitro release profiles and good bioavailability were developed. Materials and methods: A fluidized bed was used to prepare levofloxacin pellets by spraying the drug solution onto blank pellets. Then the pellets were coated with either Surelease water dispersion or Eudragit® NE30D water dispersion to achieve sustained-release characteristics. The mixed pellets containing 15% of the uncoated pellets and 85% of the coated pellets were filled into the hard gelatin capsules. In vitro release test was performed with the capsules. A single-dose pharmacokinetic study of the capsules was carried out in beagle dogs. Results: Although Eudragit® NE30D-coated pellets and Surelease-coated pellets showed similar sustained-release profiles in vitro, their in vivo pharmacokinetic characteristics exhibited significant difference. Unsuccessful in vivo–in vitro correlation was shown in Eudragit® NE30D-coated pellets with a relative bioavailability of only 41.5%, whereas Surelease-coated pellets achieved best sustained-release feature both in vitro and in vivo with a relative bioavailability of 103.0%. Conclusion: Statistical analysis indicated that the capsules containing Surelease-coated pellets had a satisfactory sustained-release behavior and a desired pharmacokinetic property.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?