Analysis of speech intelligibility after glossectomy

SUN Jian,WENG Yan-qiu,LI Jun,CHEN Yang
2009-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE: To evaluate the articulatory function of the glossectomized patients and investigate the influential factor on speech intelligibility. METHODS: From Jun. 2001 to Oct. 2004, 27 tongue cancer patients who underwent glossectomy within the range of hemi-tongue and tongue reconstructive surgery from the Ward I of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were included in this study. The speech intelligibilities were investigated within 6 months after operation with a speech intelligibility test formed by 100 sensitive Chinese words. Then they were compared according to the following factors: the type of reconstruction (reconstruction with free forearm flap, or adjacent local flap); the size of tumor (T1, T2, T3); the position of the defect (anterior, middle, posterior, or hemi-tongue); and the mobility of tongue (class I limitation, class II limitation, or class III limitation). The data were analyzed by ANOVA with SPSS11.5 software package. RESULTS: No significant difference in speech intelligibility was observed between the free forearm flap reconstruction group and adjacent flap reconstructed group (P>0.05). There was a significant difference between T1 and T3 group (P<0.05). The speech intelligibilities of thepatients with tumors in the anterior tongue or hemi-tongue were significantly lower than those with tumor in the middle tongue or posterior tongue (P <0.05). The patients with preservation of the tip of tongue or the floor of mouth had significantly higher intelligibilities (P<0.05). The speech intelligibility of the patients with good tongue mobility was significantly higher than those with poor or fair tongue mobility (P <0.01). CONCLUSION: For the patients after glossectomies within the range of hemi-tongue, exception for the type of reconstruction, the size of the tumor, the site of the post -excision defect and mobility of tongue may play key roles in determining the articulation intelligibilities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?