Questions about "Mediation Priority"

Ping-an TIAN,Hui LV
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15991/j.cnki.411028.2013.01.022
2013-01-01
Abstract:Court mediation has a long history in China,which is the characteristic and advantage of China 's civil trial.It can effectively compensate for the lack of rigid trial,and ease the pressure of court cases.At the same time,it may meet the diverse needs of the parties to resolve disputes.To some extent,it is also in favor of building the harmonious society.Therefore,it should be affirmed.However,if we overly emphasize the "Mediate priority" in the current judicial practice,there is essentially no difference with the "mediation-based" policy.Destroying the rules of governance,"Mediate priority" will result in no standards of right or wrong.What's more,it will violate the principle of voluntary and Legitimacy.The policy not only can't completely solve the dispute,but also difficult to really achieve social harmony.Moreover,there is no appropriate social environment in China at present.Based on the foregoing,we must review the "mediation priority" policy and draw lessons from history in the time of modifying the Civil Procedure Law.Thus the appropriate and supplementary Court Mediation policy should be made so that we should strictly adhere to the "voluntary" "legal" bottom line,and safeguard the right of the appeal,on the basis of re-defining the concept and connotation of the court mediation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?