Comparison of Efficacy and Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetics Treated with Controlled-Release-gliclazide and Ordinary Gliclazide Tablets

YU Dan-jing,YAO Jun-li,SHU Xue-yi,WU dan,JIANG Lin-di,GAO Xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2006.07.006
2006-01-01
BMJ
Abstract:Objective To assess clinical efficacy and quality of life (QOL) for patients of type 2 diabetes treated with controlled-release-gliclazide, as compared with those with ordinary gliclazide tablets, in a randomized controlled clinical trial stageⅡ. Methods Forty-eight eligible patients suffered from type 2 diabetes were randomly allocated to controlled-release-gliclazide group ( group A) and ordinary gliclazide tablets group ( group B) , respectively. Patients in group A received two tablets of controlled-release-gliclazide (30 mg) before breakfast and two tablets of placebo before dinner every day. Patients in group B received one tablets of ordinary gliclazide (80 mg) and one tablets of placebo two times daily. All patients were treated for 12 weeks. Blood plasma levels of glucose, C peptide and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were measured for all patients. The patients were interviewed with a specific questionnaire of quality of life and 36-item short form for health survey (SF36). Results Fasting and 2-hour postprandial plasma levels of glucose and HbA1c reduced significantly and the level of C-peptide increased significantly in both groups after treatment, as compared with those before treatment (P 0. 01). No significant difference in all clinical indicators and quality of life between the two groups was found after treatment. Scores of somatic pain and social function in SF36 improved significantly in both groups after treatment, as compared with those before treatment (P 0. 01). Rate of adverse reaction was significantly higher in group A (20. 8% ) than that in group B (8. 3% , P 0. 05) , but consequently no patients withdrew from the study. Conclusion Controlled-release-gliclazide had the similar effect on the patients with type 2 diabetes as ordinary gliclazide tablets did in improving their clinical manifestation and quality of life.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?