Legal Paternalism as a Pattern of Legal Interference
Huang Wenyi
2010-01-01
Abstract:Although there are some instances of legal paternalism in branches of law in China,its legitimacy in the system of legal discourse has not been recognized yet.One reason is that paternalism is a derogatory word in Chinese as well as in English.Moreover,there are many misunderstandings and prejudices towards paternalism,especially when people confuse it with other negative things.Most importantly,it has been long repressed and replaced by another powerful legal discourse,that is,non-paternalistic legal interference. In order to affirm the independency and legitimacy of legal paternalism,we need to clearly define its meaning and reasons.As an important pattern of legal interference,legal paternalism has two basic elements.Firstly,its objective is to maintain the actor's interest,and secondly,its approach is to restrict the actor's freedom.The reasons to support paternalistic legal interference include incapacity,economic efficiency,distributive justice,basic human rights and risk aversion. However,its affirmation doesn't mean that we can apply legal paternalism randomly to interfere with private life.On the contrary,its application should be strictly confined in China,so as to prevent the government from arbitrarily infringing on private rights.For its application,adequate reasons should be declared,the benefits should be greater than the costs,the least restrictive alternative should be preferred,public hearings should be hold,and judicial review should be available. The effectiveness of legal paternalism is heavily influenced by its characteristics.For example, many behaviors interfered by it,such as drug abuses,prostitutions,gambling,etc.,are more secret than other behaviors,so the costs of its enforcement are higher.Because the victims of such behaviors are either actors themselves or nobody,its enforcement depends on the government's capacity rather than the victims' accusation.