Comparison Study Between Small Incision of Endoscopic Thyroidectomy and Conventional Thyroidectomy

HUANG Xiao-ming,XU Geng,ZHENG Yi-qing,ZENG Liang,SUN Wei,PENG Jie-ren,LIU Wei,XU Yao-dong,ZHANG Zhi-gang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2007.10.002
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficiency,feasibility and safety of small incision endoscopic thyroidectomy(SIET)compared with conventional thyroidectomy(CT).Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients undergoing surgery owing to a thyroid nodule or goiter were allotted to one of these procedures including SIET and CT in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from July 2004 to Oct 2005.Exclusion criteria was nodules/goiter greater than 40mm.Operative time,operative blood loss,postoperative cosmetic,and complications were evaluated.Results SIET group included 55 patients and the CT 56 patients.The operative time was(103.73±26.46)min for SIET and(79.86±27.32)min for CT(P 0.001).The operative blood loss was(26.65±23.11)mL for SIET and(45.18±28.95)mL for CT(P 0.001).Cosmetic results evaluated by inquiry table was in favor of SIET.Cost of SIET was more than CT(P 0.01).When surgeons had more experiences and used the advanced harmonic scalpel,the operative time and blood loss reduced significanfly.Conclusion SIET has the major advantage in trems of operative blood loss and postoperative cosmetics.CT still offers an advantage in terms of operative time and cost.We conclude that this technique has efficiency,feasibility and safety.It can offer another choice for thyroid patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?