The Comparison of EGFR Mutation Detection in Clinical Biopsy Samples of Lung Cancer by ARMS and Direct Sequencing

赵婧雅,王笑影,曾海英,黄洁,洪群英,叶欣,朱冠山,侯英勇,张新
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2013.02.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been identified as a major determinant of the response to the treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with lung cancer. At present, there is still no unified method to detect EGFR mutations in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the sensitivity of scorpions amplification refractory mutation system (Scorpions ARMS) in comparing with that of direct DNA sequencing in the detection of EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer clinical biopsy samples, and its correlation with clinical outcomes of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs)therapy. Methods:Direct sequencing and ARMS were used simultaneously to detect EGFR mutation status in 168 formalin-fixed and parrffin-embeded (FFPE) lung cancer specimens, and the patients’ efficacy to TKIs was evaluated. Results:In 80 surgical excision samples, EGFR mutations were identified in 20 cases with a mutation rate of 25%by ARMS, while in 15 cases with a mutation rate of 18.8%by direct sequencing. Besides, the sensitivity of ARMS in surgical excision samples was 95.2%and that of direct sequencing was 71.4%. Neither mutation rate nor sensitivity between two methods showed statistical differences in the detection of surgical excision samples. In 88 biopsy samples, somatic mutations were identified in 37 cases with a mutation rate of 42.0% by ARMS, while in 17 cases with a mutation rate of 19.3%by direct sequencing. In addition, the sensitivity of ARMS in biopsy specimens was 92.5%and that of direct sequencing was 42.5%. There were significant differences of both mutation rate and sensitivity between two methods in the detection of biopsy samples (P<0.01). Among the patients receiving TKI therapy, objective response rate (ORR) of EGFR wild-type detected by direct sequencing was much higher than that of wild-type detected by ARMS (26.3%, 3.8%, respectively, P<0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with EGFR wild-type detected by direct sequencing was significantly longer than that of patients with wild-type detected by ARMS (4.0 months vs 1.5 months, P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared to direct sequencing, ARMS gains a higher sensitivity in the detection of EGFR mutations in clinical biopsy samples, and the results from ARMS are more consistent to the efficacy of TKI treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?