Abstract:Summary form only given. The evaluation of the performance of R&D in China began in the 1950s, and a number of relative theories, methods and tools have been developed in the past decades. Especially, the rising costs of R&D and the increasing dependence of companies on technology for competitive advantage are causing both external investors and managers to identify the outcomes of R&D activities. As a result, the evaluation and measurement on the R&D performance by which to check the productivity, impacts and efficiency of R&D activities has became more and more important since the 1990s. The R&D activities in China involve scientific explorations, programs and projects in firms, universities and public or private research organizations. The universities and research organizations of China play a more important role than firms in R&D, especially in the field of both basic science research and applied research. It is very important to evaluate the R&D performance of universities and research organizations in China. Many popular methods and tools, such as peer review, econometrics, scientometrics, AHP, integrated indicators, are widely used in the evaluation practice, notwithstanding their own problems or limitations. It is noticeable that the internal performance of organizations' R&D activities, such as papers published, designs produced, patents, as well as R&D/sales are paid more addition to, and more relative evaluation methods are developed and adopted, while the external impacts of R&D are comparatively ignored. Generally speaking, the current evaluation work has had less of an impact and role that they deserve. This article gives a systemic summary and analysis on the current evaluation theories and methods for R&D performance, and in the meanwhile, their limitations and drawbacks are also pointed out. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and importance of the R&D activities in the coming knowledge-based economy, some promising theories and approaches with high operability and practicability are introduced by which to evaluate the R&D performance effectively.

A New Method for Subject Development Evaluation -the Chemistry Subject Development Based on Bibliometric Indicators of the Distinguished Young Scholars

China’s research in chemical engineering journals in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

Evaluating R&D Effectiveness: a Study on Chinese Practice and Trend

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

A Scopus Database-based Study on the Structures of Disciplines of Well-known Universities of Science and Technology

Comparison of Evaluation Index of Domestic and Foreign Chemical Journals---a topic based on paper outflow of China

Statistical Analysis on Citations of Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities in 2000-2009

Evaluation of the development level, subject distribution and trend of medical basic research in China

Chemistry in China - A Bibliometric View

International Competitiveness Of Chinese Journals

How is the development of library and information science in China?

Study on ScholarsˊEvaluation Method Based on Co-author Network

Research on Bibliometric Analysis in the Subject of Author Literature Review from 1999-2008 in China

Establishment of evaluation method based on visual analogue scale for subject evaluation and comparative analysis

Research Status and Trends of Science and Technology Evaluation in China—Visual Analysis Based on Knowledge Mapping

Optimization of the Evaluation Indicators of Scholars' Research Impact and Comparative Analysis Between National and International Academic Behaviors of Researchers