Chemical Investigation of Household Solid Fuel Use and Outdoor Air Pollution Contributions to Personal PM 2.5 Exposures
Alexandra Lai,Martha Lee,Ellison Carter,Queenie Chan,Paul Elliott,Majid Ezzati,Frank Kelly,Li Yan,Yangfeng Wu,Xudong Yang,Liancheng Zhao,Jill Baumgartner,James J. Schauer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01368
2021-11-24
Abstract:In communities with household solid fuel use, transitioning to clean stoves/fuels often results in only moderate reductions in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposures; the chemical composition of those exposures may help explain why. We collected personal exposure (men and women) and outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples in villages in three Chinese provinces (Shanxi, Beijing, and Guangxi) and measured chemical components, including water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), ions, elements, and organic tracers. Source contributions from chemical mass balance modeling (biomass burning, coal combustion, vehicles, dust, and secondary inorganic aerosol) were similar between outdoor and personal PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples. Principal component analysis of organic and inorganic components identified analogous sources, including a regional ambient source. Chemical components of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures did not differ significantly by gender. Participants using coal had higher personal/outdoor (P/O) ratios of coal combustion tracers (picene, sulfate, As, and Pb) than those not using coal, but no such trend was observed for biomass burning tracers (levoglucosan, K<sup>+</sup>, WSOC). Picene and most levoglucosan P/O ratios exceeded 1 even among participants not using coal and biomass, respectively, indicating substantial indirect exposure to solid fuel emissions from other homes. Contributions of community-level emissions to exposures suggest that meaningful exposure reductions will likely require extensive fuel use changes within communities.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental