Abstract:Purpose Topology optimization of structures under self-weight loading is a challenging problem which has received increasing attention in the past years. The use of standard formulations based on compliance minimization under volume constraint suffers from numerous difficulties for self-weight dominant scenarios, such as non-monotonic behaviour of the compliance, possible unconstrained character of the optimum and parasitic effects for low densities in density-based approaches. This paper aims to propose an alternative approach for dealing with topology design optimization of structures into three spatial dimensions subject to self-weight loading. Design/methodology/approach In order to overcome the above first two issues, a regularized formulation of the classical compliance minimization problem under volume constraint is adopted, which enjoys two important features: (a) it allows for imposing any feasible volume constraint and (b) the standard (original) formulation is recovered once the regularizing parameter vanishes. The resulting topology optimization problem is solved with the help of the topological derivative method, which naturally overcomes the above last issue since no intermediate densities (grey-scale) approach is necessary. Findings A novel and simple approach for dealing with topology design optimization of structures into three spatial dimensions subject to self-weight loading is proposed. A set of benchmark examples is presented, showing not only the effectiveness of the proposed approach but also highlighting the role of the self-weight loading in the final design, which are: (1) a bridge structure is subject to pure self-weight loading; (2) a truss-like structure is submitted to an external horizontal force (free of self-weight loading) and also to the combination of self-weight and the external horizontal loading; and (3) a tower structure is under dominant self-weight loading. Originality/value An alternative regularized formulation of the compliance minimization problem that naturally overcomes the difficulties of dealing with self-weight dominant scenarios; a rigorous derivation of the associated topological derivative; computational aspects of a simple FreeFEM implementation; and three-dimensional numerical benchmarks of bridge, truss-like and tower structures.

Topology Optimization of 3-D Solid Structures for Rotational Performance

Discrete Multi-Material Topology Optimization under Total Mass Constraint

A Novel Application Framework for Self-Supporting Topology Optimization

Topology Optimization of Tensegrity Structures Considering Buckling Constraints

Topology Optimization of Continua Considering Mass and Inertia Characteristics

A Multi-Objective Topology Optimization Methodology Based on Pareto Optimal Min-Cut

2D Minimum Compliance Topology Optimization Based on a Region Partitioning Strategy

A Novel 3-D Topology Optimization Methodology Based on the Min-Cut Theorem

Structural topology optimization considering both performance and manufacturability: strength, stiffness, and connectivity

A Novel Derivative Free Methodology for Multi-Material Topology Optimization Based on Projective Transformations and Boolean Operations

Topology Optimization on Two-Dimensional Manifolds

Topology Optimization Of Orthotropic Material Structure

Multi-material topology optimization with multiple volume constraints: a general approach applied to ground structures with material nonlinearity

Topology Optimization of Continuum Structure With Globalization of Stress Constraints

Topology optimization of three-dimensional structures subject to self-weight loading

Direction-Oriented Stress-Constrained Topology Optimization of Orthotropic Materials

A dynamic topology optimization design method based on multiple domain variable parameters

Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms Considering Manufacturing Uncertainty, Fatigue, and Static Failure Constraints

Topology optimization for multi-layer multi-material composite structures

Topology Optimization of Multi-Material Structures Considering Anisotropic Yield Strengths