Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Unroofing Versus Puncture for Renal Cyst
WANG Lei,LIU Xiu-heng,KUANG You-lin,WANG Zhi-shun,XIAO Teng-fei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13329/j.cnki.zyyjk.2012.09.045
2012-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic unroofing vs puncture for treatment of kidney cyst.[Methods] The literature databases PubMed,Cochrane Library,EMbase,CNKI,WANFANG and VIP were searched for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) about laparoscopic unroofing vs puncture for the treatment of renal cyst.The duration of search was from the date of the database establishment to December 31,2011.After study selection,data extraction,assessment which were undertaken by 2 reviewers independently according to inclusion and exclusion criteria,meta-analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.0 software.[Results] Nine studies involving 702 patients met the inclusion criteria.The results of meta-analyses showed that there was no statistical difference between laparoscopic unroofing and puncture(P0.05).Compared with puncture treatment,the patients with laparoscopic unroofing had longer postoperative hospitalization length[WMD=-3.40,95%CI(-3.57,-3.23),P0.01] ,lower recurrence rate[OR=19.88,95%CI(8.62,45.85),P0.01] ,but higher cost[SMD=-5.75,95%CI(-7.58,-3.92),P0.01] .[Conclusion] The current evidence indicated that laparoscopic unroofing is similar to puncture on the treatment safety,although the cost of laparoscopic unroofing is higher and hospitalization length is longer,while the recurrence rate is less than puncture treatment.