Abstract:Abstract. The CO2 source and sink distribution across Europe can be estimated in principle through inverse methods by combining CO2 observations and atmospheric transport models. Uncertainties of such estimates are mainly due to insufficient spatiotemporal coverage of CO2 observations and biases of the models. In order to assess the biases related to the use of different models the CO2 concentration field over Europe has been simulated with five different Eulerian atmospheric transport models as part of the EU-funded AEROCARB project, which has the main goal to estimate the carbon balance of Europe. In contrast to previous comparisons, here both global coarse-resolution and regional higher-resolution models are included. Continuous CO2 observations from continental, coastal and mountain sites as well as flasks sampled on aircrafts are used to evaluate the models' ability to capture the spatiotemporal variability and distribution of lower troposphere CO2 across Europe. 14CO2 is used in addition to evaluate separately fossil fuel signal predictions. The simulated concentrations show a large range of variation, with up to ~10 ppm higher surface concentrations over Western and Central Europe in the regional models with highest (mesoscale) spatial resolution. The simulation – data comparison reveals that generally high-resolution models are more successful than coarse models in capturing the amplitude and phasing of the observed short-term variability. At high-altitude stations the magnitude of the differences between observations and models and in between models is less pronounced, but the timing of the diurnal cycle is not well captured by the models. The data comparisons show also that the timing of the observed variability on hourly to daily time scales at low-altitude stations is generally well captured by all models. However, the amplitude of the variability tends to be underestimated. While daytime values are quite well predicted, nighttime values are generally underpredicted. This is a reflection of the different mixing regimes during day and night combined with different vertical resolution between models. In line with this finding, the agreement among models is increased when sampling in the afternoon hours only and when sampling the mixed portion of the PBL, which amounts to sampling at a few hundred meters above ground. The main recommendations resulting from the study for constraining land carbon sources and sinks using high-resolution concentration data and state-of-the art transport models through inverse methods are given in the following: 1) Low altitude stations are presently preferable in inverse studies. If high altitude stations are used then the model level that represents the specific sites should be applied, 2) at low altitude sites only the afternoon values of concentrations can be represented sufficiently well by current models and therefore afternoon values are more appropriate for constraining large-scale sources and sinks in combination with transport models, 3) even when using only afternoon values it is clear that data sampled several hundred meters above ground can be represented substantially more robustly in models than surface station records, which emphasize the use of tower data in inverse studies and finally 4) traditional large scale transport models seem not sufficient to resolve fine-scale features associated with fossil fuel emissions, as well as larger-scale features like the concentration distribution above the south-western Europe. It is therefore recommended to use higher resolution models for interpretation of continental data in future studies.

Inverse Modeling of Annual Atmospheric Co2 Sources and Sinks 1. Method and Control Inversion

Inverse Modeling of Annual Atmospheric Co2 Sources and Sinks 2. Sensitivity Study

TransCom 3 CO2 Inversion Intercomparison: 1. Annual Mean Control Results and Sensitivity to Transport and Prior Flux Information

Regional Biospheric Carbon Fluxes As Inferred from Atmospheric CO 2 Measurements

Sensitivity of Inverse Estimation of Annual Mean CO2 Sources and Sinks to Ocean‐only Sites Versus All‐sites Observational Networks

A European Summertime CO2biogenic Flux Inversion at Mesoscale from Continuous in Situ Mixing Ratio Measurements

Towards Robust Regional Estimates of CO2 Sources and Sinks Using Atmospheric Transport Models

Influence of Two Atmospheric Transport Models on Inferring Sources and Sinks of Atmospheric Co2

Partitioning of Ocean and Land Uptake of CO2 As Inferred by Δ13c Measurements from the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Global Air Sampling Network

Estimating High Latitude Carbon Fluxes with Inversions of Atmospheric CO2

Estimating the Distribution of Terrestrial CO2 Sources and Sinks from Atmospheric Measurements: Sensitivity to Configuration of the Observation Network

Daily Co2 Flux Estimates over Europe from Continuous Atmospheric Measurements: 1, Inverse Methodology

Comparing Atmospheric Transport Models for Future Regional Inversions over Europe - Part 1: Mapping the Atmospheric Co2 Signals

CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements

Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe – Part 1: mapping the atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; signals

Partitioning Of Ocean And Land Uptake Of Co2 As Inferred By Delta-C-13 Measurements From The Noaa Climate Monitoring And Diagnostics Laboratory Global Air Sampling Network

Atmospheric Inversions for Estimating Co2 Fluxes: Methods and Perspectives

Inferring CO2 sources and sinks from satellite observations: Method and application to TOVS data

Variability and Budget of CO2 in Europe: Analysis of the CAATER Airborne Campaigns – Part 2: Comparison of CO2 Vertical Variability and Fluxes Between Observations and a Modeling Framework

Global Atmospheric Carbon Budget: Results from an Ensemble of Atmospheric Co2 Inversions

Inverse modeling of CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks using satellite data: A synthetic inter-comparison of measurement techniques and their performance as a function of space and time