Carbon Capture and Storage in China - Main Findings from China-Uk Near Zero Emissions Coal (nzec) Initiative

Bill Senior,Wenying Chen,Jon Gibbins,Heather Haydock,Mingyuan Li,Jonathan Pearce,Wenbin Su,Dan Ulanowsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.598

2011-01-01

Energy Procedia

Abstract:The China-UK Near Zero Emissions Coal (NZEC) Initiative examined options for carbon (CO2) capture, transport and geological storage in China. It was developed under the 2005 EU-China NZEC Agreement which aims to demonstrate CCS in China and the EU. Collaborative research activities were conducted jointly by Chinese and UK experts from 30 organisations. China's energy demand is expected to continue growing significantly; however the share of coal is projected to decrease to around 50% by 2050. For the power generation and energy intensive industrial sectors, all of which remain heavily dependent on coal, CCS is the only option that can ensure a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. A range of CO2 capture technologies in coal-fired power generation have been examined. The more promising, near term options are post-combustion capture using Monoethanolamine in a state of the art pulverised coal power plant and pre-combustion capture in an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle unit. The cost of electricity generation with capture would be 463 and 413 RMB per MWh respectively for these options. Less mature capture technology options offer some potential to lower the overall cost, but this is within the range of uncertainties. Storage assessments were undertaken in two basins in North East China. These have potential to make use of CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) although the reservoirs are geologically complex and well integrity may be a significant risk. While CO2 EOR would provide the opportunity for gaining initial experience with CO2 injection and storage, the capacity available for EOR in these regions appears insufficient for large scale CCS. It would therefore be necessary to assess and ultimately use saline aquifers for storage. An extensive saline aquifer formation has been identified in the Songliao Basin through the project. The average cost of electricity generation taking account of capture, transport and storage costs (assuming a storage site 200km from the power plant) would be 470 RMB per MWh for the most mature capture options, an increase of around 200 RMB per MWh compared with a Pulverised Coal reference plant without CCS. This is equivalent to a cost of avoided emissions of about 280 RMB (US $50.0) per tonne of CO2. There are several challenges that need to be addressed for CCS in China. These include the extra cost and energy penalty of CCS, the novelty of the technology, the lack of regulations governing the storage of CO2 underground and the availability of the necessary equipment for deployment of CCS in China. The China-UK NZEC Initiative has shown that CCS could provide a key, low carbon option for coal-based industry in China, particularly for power generation, which would enable the continued use of coal with reduced greenhouse gas emissions. An Memorandum of Understanding was signed by the European Commission and Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology for Phase II of the China-EU NZEC Agreement in November 2009. Phase II will involve the selection of a demonstration project and the completion of a feasibility study. Phase III will involve the construction and operation of a CCS demonstration project in China. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.