Total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in treatment of osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of hip

WANG Jian,SHI Zhan-jun,LI Jian-yi,LI Zhi-han,ZHAO Zan-dong,ZHU Zhi-gang,XIAO Jun,CHEN Guo-fen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2010.05.003
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss the feasibility of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty (THRA) in treatment of osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) and related matters which need to be paid attention to.Methods 11 DDH patients with 13 hips were dealt with THRA from 2006 to 2009,including four male patients with four hips and seven female patients with nine hips,whose average age was (43.0±11.6) years and average Harris score was (56.9±17.8).According to Karl Perner Classification of DDH,seven hips were in stage Ⅰ,three hips were in stage Ⅱ and the other three hips were in stage Ⅲ.According to Hartofilakids Classification of DDH,11 hips were in stage Ⅰ and two hips were in stage Ⅱ.All patients were implanted with metal-on-metal resurfacing prostheses.Femoral head was fixed with cement and the acetabular cup was biologically fixed.Results Each patient got a follow-up after the surgery and detailed conditions were recorded.There was significant difference in Harris Score between the preoperation data and the postoperation data.Also,there was significant difference in Harris Score between the postoperation data and the data of the last follow-up.In preoperation,the average Sharp angle was (47.7±6.5) (33.8-56.4) degrees; the average head-heck ratio was (1.47±0.11) (1.29-1.64); the neck-shaft angle was (141.2±9.7) (126.7-162.2) in anverage; and the anverage CE angle was (12.3±12.3) (7.5-28.8) degrees.In postoperation,the acetabular abduction angel was (46.8±12.9) (22.4-69.3) degrees in anverage and the average stem-shaft angle was (143.0±9.2) (126.8-159.1) degrees.In one case,loosening line was found around the acetabular cup.Six cups were totally covered by the acetabular bone.There were uncovered edges less than 0.5 cm in two cups,while the uncovered edges were more than 0.5 cm in other five cups.Conclusions Improper position of prosthesis may result from mismatch of head-acetabulum components,abmormal head-neck ratio,abnormal neck-shaft angle and much shallower acetabulum,so DDH is not a good indication for THRA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?