Reassessment of the Efficacy of Risedronate Sodium Capsules in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

郭郡浩,姚茹冰,赵智明,刘玉秀,郑均,蔡辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-8199.2009.02.012
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate efficacy of risedronate sodium capsules in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis(PMOP) by the least significant change(LSC)-adjusted method(LAM).Methods This is a randomized double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical trial.42 patients with PMOP were randomly divided into 2 groups: trial group(n=21) and control group(n=21).During 12 months,patients in the trail group received risedronate sodium capsules orally every morning,while patients of control group took placebo orally every morning,and meanwhile all patients took calcichew D orally every night.The double-energy bone density measurement was used to determine lumbar and hip bone mineral density(BMD) at 3 time points(before treatment,6 months and 12 months after treatment).Meanwhile,the effect on BMD was evaluated by LAM to compare with the result evaluated by normal distribution analytical method(NAM).Results The sample change data for lumbar BMD by(LAM) showed that there was statistical significance in the changes 6 and 12 months after continuous treatment between the trial group and control group respectively(P0.05),while no statistical significance in the change data for hip BMD was observed between the two groups(P0.05).The results of efficacy about BMD by LAM were consistent with those by NAM.Conclusion The results by LAM and NAM have high concordance.There are both advantages and disadvantages respectively in the evaluation of the efficacy about BMD by LAM and NAM.The two methods should be used alone or meanwhile when necessary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?