Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of recombinant prourokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Liang Feng,Hu Dayi,Wu Mingying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2194.2006.03.013
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective In this angiographic trial,we compared the efficacy and safety of Pro-UK with urokinase in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction.Methods We recruited patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction presented within 6 hours in Beijing Tongren Hospital offiliated to Capital Vnirersity of Medical Sciences from Feb.2003 to Mar.2004.After giving informed consent,patients were assigned a bolus and infusion of Pro-UK or a infusion of urokinase.The primary efficacy end points and safety end points were observed.Results Overall 26 patients were enrolled in the trial,of whom 16 patients were assigned to receive Pro-UK(6 patients to 40mg,6 patients to 50 mg,4 patients to 60 mg),and 10 patients to urokinase.The rates of TIMI grade 3 flow were 56.25%(9/16)with Pro-UK and 70%(7/10) with urokinase(P=0.683),of whom 66.7%(4/6) with 50 mg Pro-UK,75%(3/4)with 60 mg Pro-UK. The rates of TIMI grade 2 or 3 were similar for patients treated with Pro-UK versus urokinase(56.25% and 80%,respectively,P=0.399). All safety end points were similar between the two groups. The level of fibrinogen in blood plasma was significantly higher in Pro-UK group than that in urokinase group,indicating that Pro-UK had higher fibrin-specificity.Conclusion The bolus and 30 minutes infusion of Pro-UK 50 mg and 60 mg was clinically safe and effective thrombolytic regimen,but need further study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?