Abstract:Background: Coronary plaque vulnerability prediction is difficult because plaque vulnerability is non-trivial to quantify, clinically available medical image modality is not enough to quantify thin cap thickness, prediction methods with high accuracies still need to be developed, and gold-standard data to validate vulnerability prediction are often not available. Patient follow-up intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography data were acquired to construct 3D fluid-structure interaction (FSI) coronary models and four machine-learning methods were compared to identify optimal method to predict future plaque vulnerability. Methods: Baseline and 10-month follow-up in vivo IVUS and OCT coronary plaque data were acquired from two arteries of one patient using IRB approved protocols with informed consent obtained. IVUS and OCT-based FSI models were constructed to obtain plaque wall stress/strain and wall shear stress. Forty-five slices were selected as machine learning sample database for vulnerability prediction study. Thirteen key morphological factors from IVUS and OCT images and biomechanical factors from FSI model were extracted from 45 slices at baseline for analysis. Lipid percentage index (LPI), cap thickness index (CTI) and morphological plaque vulnerability index (MPVI) were quantified to measure plaque vulnerability. Four machine learning methods (least square support vector machine, discriminant analysis, random forest and ensemble learning) were employed to predict the changes of three indices using all combinations of 13 factors. A standard fivefold cross-validation procedure was used to evaluate prediction results. Results: For LPI change prediction using support vector machine, wall thickness was the optimal single-factor predictor with area under curve (AUC) 0.883 and the AUC of optimal combinational-factor predictor achieved 0.963. For CTI change prediction using discriminant analysis, minimum cap thickness was the optimal single-factor predictor with AUC 0.818 while optimal combinational-factor predictor achieved an AUC 0.836. Using random forest for predicting MPVI change, minimum cap thickness was the optimal single-factor predictor with AUC 0.785 and the AUC of optimal combinational-factor predictor achieved 0.847. Conclusion: This feasibility study demonstrated that machine learning methods could be used to accurately predict plaque vulnerability change based on morphological and biomechanical factors from multi-modality image-based FSI models. Large-scale studies are needed to verify our findings.

Morphological study of atherosclerotic plaque and its application in vulnerability evaluation

[Biomechanical Models and Numerical Studies of Atherosclerotic Plaque].

Morphological and Stress Vulnerability Indices for Human Coronary Plaques and Their Correlations with Cap Thickness and Lipid Percent: an IVUS-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Multi-patient Study

Validation of biomechanical assessment of coronary plaque vulnerability based on intravascular optical coherence tomography and digital subtraction angiography

Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability quantification system for clinical and biological interpretability

Current status in research of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque

Ultrasound Assessment of the Relation Between Local Hemodynamic Parameters and Plaque Morphology

Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques

Image-based biomechanical modeling for coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability prediction

Novel ultrasound techniques in the identification of vulnerable plaques-an updated review of the literature

Quantitative assessment of coronary artery plaque vulnerability by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and computational biomechanics: a pilot study ex vivo.

Abstract 379: Introducing Stress-Based Quantitative Plaque Vulnerability Index for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

The Need to Shift from Morphological to Structural Assessment for Carotid Plaque Vulnerability.

Characteristics and evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques: an overview of state-of-the-art techniques

Predicting plaque vulnerability change using intravascular ultrasound + optical coherence tomography image-based fluid-structure interaction models and machine learning methods with patient follow-up data: a feasibility study

Characterization of the Atherosclerotic Plaque Tissue

Deciphering the complex mechanics of atherosclerotic plaques: a hybrid hierarchical theory-microrheology approach

IVUS-based Fluid-structure Interaction Models for Novel Plaque Vulnerability Indices: A Study in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Stress-Based Plaque Vulnerability Index and Assessment for Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques Using Patient-Specific Vessel Material Properties

Numerical Study of the Mechanical Interaction Between the Carotid Atherosclerosis Plaque and the Blood Flow Field Distribution: A Geometric Assessment of the Plaque Vulnerability

Multi-parameter characterization of atherosclerotic plaques based on optical coherence tomography, photoacoustic and viscoelasticity imaging