Differences in MRI Measures of Brain Volume, White Matter Hyperintensities and Infarcts in Chinese: the Shanghai Community Brain Health Initiative (SCOBHI)

Charles DeCarli,Amy Borenstein,Jing He,Ding,Dong Young Lee,Oliver Martinez,Owen Carmichael,James A. Mortimer,Qianhua Zhao,Qihao Guo,Douglas Galasko,David Salmon,Qi Dai,Yougui Wu,Ronald Petersen,Zhen Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2009.05.636
2009-01-01
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:China is a nation with the potential for 300 million elders over 65 by the year 2030 at risk for dementia, but the etiology of dementia in China has been understudied. We conducted a pilot study of 26 normal controls, 26 MCI and 43 dementia cases in Shanghai, China between May and November 2008. Cases were those presenting to the Memory Disorders Clinic at Huashan Hospital who were diagnosed per study protocol with dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment by standard clinical criteria. Controls were recruited from the Jing An community by door-to-door approach. MRI imaging was performed in China and the data transferred to UCD for analysis. 95 subjects were included in this analysis (average age: 75±5.22), 52% female with 26 normal elderly (average age: 73.96±5.83). Brain volume and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were measured from the FLAIR and two expert raters rated MR infarcts. There we no significant group differences by age, gender or education. Brain and WMH volumes were significantly different by diagnosis (p < 0.0001 and 0.0005 respectively) with 4% difference in brain and 15% in WMH volumes. The prevalence of MRI infarcts was increased in dementia versus normal and MCI (53%, 30% and 31%, respectively, p=0.025). Cortical infarcts were rare (5% prevalence) with no cortical infarcts identified in normals, and 5% and 9% of MCI and demented, respectively. The prevalence of subcortical infarcts also was increased in dementia versus normal and MCI (37%, 22%, 19% respectively; p=0.01). Finally, age, diagnosis and MRI infarcts were associated with WMH volumes (p <0.0006), whereas age, diagnosis and WMH volumes were significantly associated with brain volume (p=0.026). Evidence of cerebrovascular disease and brain atrophy was common in cognitively impaired subjects of the SCOBHI study. Moreover, MRI infarcts were associated with WMH volume and WMH volume was also significantly associated with brain volume, suggesting that the biology of cognitive impairment in SCOBHI likely reflects, in part, the effects of vascular brain injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?