Effect of expressive writing intervention on social support, resilience and school maladjustment in university freshman
Y. Wen,Bo Lian,D. Zheng,Yanyu Wang,Nengzhi Jiang,Hongwei Sun,Lin Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2018.02.017
2018-02-20
Abstract:Objective
To explore the effect of expressive writing intervention on social support, resilience and school maladjustment in university freshman.
Methods
Selecting the freshmen volunteer of 600 university freshmen of Shandong, through the scale before the test recovery and comprehensive scoring chosen the part of low grade college students as the intervention object and were divided into writing expression(n=60) person and control group(n=60). The intervention group received a positive subject writing expression and the control group in the normal writing.Before and after the intervention tested the social support rating scale, the resilience scale for Chinese adolescents and the the student adaptation to college questionnaire were tested to evaluate the effect of active writing expression intervention.
Results
(1)After intervention, the intervention group and the control group had significant differences among the scales, objective support(t=-2.36, P<0.05), learning adaptation(t=-1.98, P<0.05) and subjective support(t=-2.56, P<0.05), target focus(t=-2.66, P<0.01), emotional control(t=-2.81, P<0.01), family support (t=-3.46, P<0.01), adaptation (t=-2.73, P<0.01), support utilization (t=-5.91, P<0.01) and social support score (t=-4.04, P<0.01), positive cognition (t=-2.73, P<0.01), interpersonal assistance (t= -3.13, P<0.01), resilience score (t=-7.40, P<0.01), life adaptation (t=-3.83, P<0.01), emotional state (t=-3.39, P<0.01), and school adaptation score (t=-3.46, P<0.01). (2)There was no significant difference in objective support between the control group before intervention and after intervention.In addition, the remaining dimensions such as subjective support (20.72±2.46, 22.96±2.81, t=4.54, P<0.01), support utilization (7.49±1.40, 9.86±1.90, t=7.56, P<0.01) and social support score (36.79±4.24, 41.89±5.18, t= 5.76, P<0.01) were significantly increased. The intervention group had significant difference among target focus (15.98±2.86, 17.89±3.35, t=3.28, P<0.01), emotional control (14.98±2.77, 15.70±2.71, t=3.35, P<0.01), positive cognition (14.61±2.04, 16.26±3.09, t=3.36, P<0.01), interpersonal assistance (15.30±2.44, 17.49±2.73, t=4.52, P<0.01), resilience score(77.65±6.01, 88.25±5.74, t=9.63, P<0.01) and family support(16.77±2.28, 19.58±2.44, t=6.35, P<0.01). In the intervention group of school adaptation scale, life adaptation (40.44±6.36, 45.12±7.21, t=3.68, P<0.01), emotional state (34.04±6.99, 38.84±5.95, t=3.95, P<0.01)and school adaptation score (145.21±22.86, 160.51±21.78, t=3.66, P<0.01), interpersonal assistance (32.30±5.34, 35.23±5.18, t=2.98, P<0.01), learning adaptation(38.44±7.06, 41.32±5.92, t=2.36, P<0.05) were significantly increased.
Conclusion
Written expression intervention has a positive effect on improving the low level of social support, the poor resilience and freshman’s adaptation to college.
Key words:
Freshmen; Expressive writing; Resilience; Intervention
Psychology