Immunohistochemical localization of inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in porcine ovaries and effects of NO on antrum formation and oocyte meiotic maturation.

Yong Tao,Zhuo Fu,Meijia Zhang,Guoliang Xia,Jie Yang,Huirong Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2004.04.014
IF: 4.369
2004-01-01
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
Abstract:The present study is to investigate the immunolocalization of endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase (eNOS, iNOS) in porcine ovary and the effect of nitric oxide (NO) on antrum formation and oocyte meiotic resumption. In Experiment 1, preantral follicles (250–300μm in diameter) were cultured in 0 (Control), 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 or 1mM sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a NO donor. In Experiment 2, the cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) aspirated from medium follicles (3–6mm in diameter) were incubated in 0.1mM SNP or two inhibitors for NOS, 10mM aminoguanidine bicarbonate salt (AG) or 1mM Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), alone or concomitantly. In Experiment 3, ovarian tissues, corpus luteum (CL), corpus albican (CA) and COCs from small (1–2mm in diameter), medium (3–6mm) and large follicles (7–10mm) were isolated, rinsed, fixed, paraffin embedded and stained by the conventional avidin–biotin complex method for the detection of eNOS and iNOS production. The results showed that 0.1mM SNP had no effect on antrum formation (P>0.05) while 0.3, 0.5 or 1mM significantly inhibited the antrum formation (P<0.05). AG markedly inhibited porcine oocyte meiotic resumption (P<0.05) while l-NAME inhibited first polar body (PB1) extrusion (P<0.05). The immunoreactivity of eNOS in early antral follicles was restricted to oocyte and it increased from small, medium to large follicle-enclosed oocytes. Cumulus cells from large follicles showed weak eNOS immunoreactivity but those from small or medium follicles not. In CL, eNOS-positive staining was shown in granulosa lutein cells. In CA, it was in some parenchymal cells. In contrast, no immunoreactivity for iNOS was found in primordial, early antral follicle or the COCs aspirated from small and medium follicles. The large follicle-enclosed oocyte showed weak immunoreactivity. In CL, some granulosa lutein cells showed iNOS-positive cytoplasm. Such immunostaining was not found in CA. The results demonstrate that porcine ovaries have distinct cell-specific expression of both eNOS and iNOS, and that NO derived from both NOS is actively involved in meiotic resumption. Nitric oxide is not involved in the antrum formation of preantral follicles but exogenous NO inhibits the antrum formation. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase and inducible nitric oxide synthase might be differently functional in CL development and regression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?