Abstract:Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Volume 32, Issue 6, June 2022. Previous studies on network robustness mainly concentrated on hub node failures with fully known network structure information. However, hub nodes are often well protected and not accessible to damage or malfunction in a real-world networked system. In addition, one can only gain insight into limited network connectivity knowledge due to large-scale properties and dynamic changes of the network itself. In particular, two different aggression patterns are present in a network attack: memory based attack, in which failed nodes are not attacked again, or non-memory based attack; that is, nodes can be repeatedly attacked. Inspired by these motivations, we propose an attack pattern with and without memory based on randomly choosing [math] non-hub nodes with known connectivity information. We use a network system with the Poisson and power-law degree distribution to study the network robustness after applying two failure strategies of non-hub nodes. Additionally, the critical threshold [math] and the size of the giant component [math] are determined for a network configuration model with an arbitrary degree distribution. The results indicate that the system undergoes a continuous second-order phase transition subject to the above attack strategies. We find that [math] gradually tends to be stable after increasing rapidly with [math]. Moreover, the failure of non-hub nodes with a higher degree is more destructive to the network system and makes it more vulnerable. Furthermore, from comparing the attack strategies with and without memory, the results highlight that the system shows better robustness under a non-memory based attack relative to memory based attacks for [math]. Attacks with memory can block the system's connectivity more efficiently, which has potential applications in real-world systems. Our model sheds light on network resilience under memory and non-memory based attacks with limited information attacks and provides valuable insights into designing robust real-world systems.

Model for Invulnerability of Complex Networks with Incomplete Information Based on Unequal Probability Sampling

New attack strategies for complex networks

Attack Vulnerability of Network Controllability.

The Dynamic Correlation Between Degree and Betweenness of Complex Network under Attack

A quantitative method for determining the robustness of complex networks

Correlation of Centralities: A Study Through Distinct Graph Robustness

CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF ATTACK STRATEGIESAND ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS ON THREE NETWORK MODELS

Cascading Failures of K Uniform Hyper-Network Based on the Hyper Adjacent Matrix

A Stochastic Model for Quantitative Security Analyses of Networked Systems.

Attack vulnerability of complex networks

Robustness of Interdependent Networks under Several Intentional Attack Strategies

Sequential defense against random and intentional attacks in complex networks

Breakdown of an Inhomogeneous Scale-Free Network under Intentional Attack

Vulnerability of Clustering under Node Failure in Complex Networks

Uncertainty Quantification of Multi-Scale Resilience in Nonlinear Complex Networks Using Arbitrary Polynomial Chaos

Cascading failures in spatial complex networks

Structural Vulnerability Analysis of Partially Interdependent Networks: The Joint Influence of Interdependence and Local Worlds

Network resilience of non-hub nodes failure under memory and non-memory based attacks with limited information

Resilience to Intentional Attacks of Complex Networks

Robustness of Complex Networks against Attacks Guided by Damage

Dynamic‐event‐based state estimation of complex networks against attacks and innovation outliers: The probability constraint case