Comparing three methods of preparing tissue engineering tracheal matrix

Wu Fan,Zhang Zhi-pei,Wang Jian,Li Jian-zhong,Jin Yan,Jiang Tao,Han Yong,Li Xiao-fei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.02.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:It is a key step to prepare tracheal matrices in tissue engineering for repairing long segment tracheal defects. OBJECTIVE:To find the better method for preparing tissue engineering tracheal matrices through comparing and analyzing three different ways of preparing allogeneic acellular tracheal matrices. METHODS:Fresh rabbit tracheas were obtained by surgical operation and divided to four groups:untreated group, conventional vitrificational group, detergent-enzymatic group, modified vitrificational group. Hematoxylin-eosin staining and scanning electron microscopy were used to observe the morphology and ultrastructure of the treated tracheal matrices. The biomechanical properties including maximum tensile force, rupture force and tissue elongation of the treated tracheal matrices were measured. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Histological observations showed that there were epithelial cells in the untreated and conventional vitrificational groups, but there were no epithelial cells in the detergent-enzymatic and modified vitrificational groups. There were abundant extracellular matrices and collagen fibers in the untreated group, conventional vitrificational group, and modified vitrificational group under electromicroscopy. Conversely, no extracellular matrix was found in the detergent-enzymatic group, in which there were only collagen fibers. Finally, no statistical differences were found in the maximum tensile force, rupture force and tissue elongation among all the groups. The method of modified vitrification, by which the antigen can be removed, and the extracellular matrix and biomechanical properties can be maintained effectively, is a more ideal way to prepare tissue engineering tracheal matrix.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?