Abstract:The development of International Relations theory (IRT) in China has been framed by three debates since 1979. The first was about China's opening up to the outside world. It started with the question of whether the world was characterized by ‘war and revolution’ or ‘peace and development’ between orthodox and reformist scholars and continued to focus on China's interest between orthodox scholars and the newly rising Chinese realists. It resulted in a wide acceptance of the reformist argument that peace and development characterized our era and of the realist view that China was a normal nation-state and should have its own legitimate national interest. The second started in the early 1990s and centered on the better way of realizing China's national interest. It was between Chinese realists and liberals. While the former emphasized national power, the latter proposed the alternative approach of international institutions. The third debate was on China's peaceful rise. It evolved at the turn of the century, when all the three major American IRTs, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, had been introduced into China and therefore the debate was more a tripartite contention. Realists believed that it was impossible for any major power to rise peacefully, while liberals and constructivists both supported the peaceful-rise argument. Liberals stressed more the tangible benefits derived from international institutions and constructivists explored more China's identity in its increasing interaction with international society. Although it was Chinese constructivists who explicitly discussed the identity issue, all the three debates and all the debating sides have reflected this century puzzle since the Opium War – China's identity vis-à-vis international society. These debates have helped push forward the IRT development in China and at the same time established Western IRT as the dominant discourse. A new round of debate seems likely to occur and may center on the question of the world order. This time it may help the newly burgeoning but highly dynamic Chinese IRT to develop and contribute to the enrichment of IRT as knowledge of human life.

Development of European International Relations Research:Based on Articles in the European Journal of International Relations from 1997-2006

Chinese Journal of European Studies (2003-2007):From the Perspective of Academic History Study

Internationalization of Higher Education: on the Study of the European Case

Reflections on International Studies in China:A General Review of the Sub-fields(III)

On the Relationship between Culture and International Relations Studies

The European Union and Interregionalism:Regional Effects and Global Influences

On the New Aspects and Perspective of IR Studies in the West

On the Existing Problems and the Changing Tendency of Curriculum Development and Theoretical Evolution of International Relations

Problems in and Reflections on Studies of International Relations in China

A new level in international studies:theory and practice of interregionalism

Twenty years of the European information systems academy at ECIS: emergent trends and research topics

Introduction: China and the European Union: Perspectives from the European Law Journal

European Integration Theory

On China's Perspective in International Studies

Progress of IR Studies in China: A Critique and Reflection

Origin,Contemporary and Synthetic Development Trend of New Regionalism

Innovative Studies for International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics:A New Agenda,a New Framework,and New Challenges

Two-way Dynamics of Europeanization:A New Research Framework

IR Studies in China:A Discipline in Transition

Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates

Two Theoretical Approaches in ESDP Studies:Europeanization and Political Sociology