Speech-in-Noise Assessment in the Routine Audiologic Test Battery: Relationship to Perceived Auditory Disability
Matthew B Fitzgerald,Kristina M Ward,Steven P Gianakas,Michael L Smith,Nikolas H Blevins,Austin P Swanson,Matthew B. Fitzgerald,Kristina M. Ward,Steven P. Gianakas,Michael L. Smith,Nikolas H. Blevins,Austin P. Swanson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001472
2024-02-29
Ear & Hearing
Abstract:Self-assessment of perceived communication ability in patients with hearing loss has been a topic of interest for decades, with questionnaires being used since the onset of audiology ( Davis 1948 ; High et al. 1964 ). Several reasons have been put forth as to why self-assessment of hearing handicap is thought to be meaningful in both research and clinical practices. For example, self-assessment scales have been suggested to have the potential to assess perceived function in real-world listening environments that cannot be easily replicated within laboratory or clinical scenarios ( Cox 2003 ). They have also been consistently utilized as an outcome measure after fitting of hearing aids, osseointegrated devices, or cochlear implants ( Noble & Gatehouse 2006 ; Dillon et al. 2017 ; Snapp et al. 2017 ). Self-perception of hearing ability has also been shown to predict which patients are likely to pursue amplification ( Palmer et al. 2009 ), and self-assessment scales have also demonstrated that patients with higher degrees of autonomous motivation were more likely to pursue help for hearing difficulties ( Ridgway et al. 2017 ). Lastly, self-assessment scales have the advantage of being extremely versatile, and in the audiologic community have not only been utilized to assess the impact of hearing loss or hearing aids, but also the effect of other symptoms such as dizziness ( Jacobson & Newman 1990 ) and tinnitus ( Newman et al. 1996 ; Henry et al. 2016 ).
otorhinolaryngology,audiology & speech-language pathology