HIF-1  and HIF-2  Play Distinct and Functionally Overlapping Roles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

G.-q. Zhu,Y.-l. Tang,L. Li,M. Zheng,J. Jiang,X.-y. Li,S.-x. Chen,X.-h. liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1408

IF: 13.801

2010-01-01

Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract:Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the functional difference between hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). Experimental Design: We evaluated the correlations between HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha expression and the clinical-pathologic characteristics of 97 patients with OSCC by immunohistochemical staining. OSCC cell lines transfected with lentivirus encoding short hairpin RNA against HIF-1 alpha/2 alpha were used to investigate the HIF-1 alpha/2 alpha-dependent target genes. Xenograft tumors in nude mice were established using cells affected by lentivirus, and tumor growth, angiogenesis, proliferation, and apoptosis were measured. Results: HIF-1 alpha expression was significantly associated with T stage (P = 0.004), lymph node involvement (P = 0.006), histologic differentiation (P = 0.013), and microvessel density (P = 0.014), whereas that of HIF-2 alpha was associated with T stage (P = 0.011) and microvessel density (P = 0.005). Patients with positive HIF-1 alpha nuclear staining had a significantly worse overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001) than those with negative HIF-1 alpha staining. When OSCC cells were cultured at 5% O-2, only HIF-2 alpha contributed to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. At 1% O-2, vascular endothelial growth factor was regulated by both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha, but glucose transporter 1, carbonic anhydrase 9, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor were regulated by HIF-1 alpha rather than by HIF-2 alpha. Knocking down HIF-1 alpha or HIF-2 alpha individually inhibited the xenograft tumor angiogenesis and growth, and knocking them down simultaneously revealed a better inhibitory effect than knocking down either unit alone. Conclusions: HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha correlated with different clinical-pathologic parameters, stabilized at different oxygen levels, and regulated different genes in OSCC. However, both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha showed promoting roles in tumor angiogenesis and growth, and therapeutic outcome may benefit from combined targeting of HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha. Clin Cancer Res; 16(19); 4732-41. (C) 2010 AACR.