The Clinical Significance of Anti-aquaporin 4 Antibodies in Neuropsychiatric SLE Based on Peptides Antigen -ELISA Assay

曹芸,陆晓晔,陈晓翔,钱洁,赵江峰,顾越英,叶霜
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6358.2010.04.050
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To establish the method of testing anti-aquaporin 4(AQ-4) antibodies and evaluate the clinical significances of anti-AQ-4 antibodies in NPSLE.Methods: Three peptides from the extracellular domain of AQ-4 protein were synthesized and coated as antigen.The IgG type anti-AQ-4 antibodies were assayed in the sera of 49 healthy controls,54 patients with other rheumatic diseases,105 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE),103 patients with neuropsychiatric SLE,and in cerebral spine fluid samples of 22 patients without rheumatic disease,31 patients with SLE,96 patients with NPSLE and 27 SLE patients with tuberculous meningitis,and 8 SLE patients with cryptococcal meningitis.Results: The cutoff values were determined by the average optical density of control group plus 3 standard deviations.In sera samples,there were only 1.8%(1/54)positive in healthy controls,14.3%(15/105) in SLE group,22.3%(23/103) in NPSLE group.In CSF samples,there were 0% in control group,12.9%(4/31) in SLE group,29.2%(28/96) in NPSLE group,37%(10/27)in SLE patients with tuberculous meningitis,0%(0/8)in SLE patients with crypoccoccal meningitis.In either sera samples or CSF samples,the positive rate of anti-AQ-4 antibodies was significant higher in NPSLE than that of in SLE patients(P0.01).The anti-AQ-4 antibodies in CSF samples(29.2%)were significant higher than that of in sera samples(22.3%)(P0.01)in NPSLE patients,but there was no difference in SLE group(P0.05).In the CSF samples,the level of anti-AQ-4 antibodies in SLE patients with tuberculous meningitis than that of in other groups(P0.01).Conclusions: Anti-AQ-4 antibodies were significant higher in sera and CSF of NPSLE patients,especial in CSF,and the relative higher positive rate of anti-AQ-4 antibodies in SLE patients with tuberculous meningitis suggested that anti-AQ4 antibodies may increase the infection chances in SLE patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?